Equivalent resistance in a parallel circuit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the equivalent resistance in a parallel circuit with two resistors, R1 and R2, is always less than the resistance of either resistor. Participants are exploring the implications of the formula for equivalent resistance and its properties.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss starting points for the proof, including the relationship R1 + R2 > R1 and the implications of positive resistance values. Questions are raised about the ratios of equivalent resistance to individual resistances and the validity of inequalities derived from the resistance formula.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of mathematical relationships and inequalities related to equivalent resistance. Some participants provide guidance on manipulating equations and checking assumptions, while others express uncertainty about the direction of the reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that all resistances are positive, and there is a focus on the mathematical properties of the equivalent resistance formula. The discussion includes attempts to clarify the implications of various algebraic manipulations.

Kurokari
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that the equivalent resistance in a parallel circuit with 2 resistors with resistance R1 and R2 is always lesser than the resistance of either resistor.

Homework Equations



Rt= (R1 x R2)/(R1 + R2)


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried starting from R1 + R2 > R1 , where R2 > 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If Rt is smaller than either R1 or R2, then what does that say about the ratios Rt/R1 and Rt/R2?
 
Kurokari said:

Homework Statement



Prove that the equivalent resistance in a parallel circuit with 2 resistors with resistance R1 and R2 is always lesser than the resistance of either resistor.

Homework Equations



Rt= (R1 x R2)/(R1 + R2)


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried starting from R1 + R2 > R1 , where R2 > 0

That is a good start. The resistances are all positive, R1, R2 and also Rt.

You know that the reciprocal of the parallel resistances add up:

1/Rt=1/R1+1/R2

Multiply the equation by Rt. ...

ehild
 
You can simply compute the difference between R_t and R_1 or R_2 which is easily seen to be positive

\frac {R_1 R_2} {R_1 + R_2} - R_1 =
 
EDIT: I've come up to R1/(R1 + R2) > R1 , where R2 > 0

since R1+R2>R1 , then when R1 is divided by R1+R2(a larger number), surely R1/(R1+R2) is lesser than the original number.

now I can't have any reasoning that when I multiply R1/(R1+R2) by R2, tht this inequality still stands.

EDIT:
willem2 said:
You can simply compute the difference between R_t and R_1 or R_2 which is easily seen to be positive

\frac {R_1 R_2} {R_1 + R_2} - R_1 =

I see thanks, but isn't it the other way around?
 
Last edited:
willem2 said:
You can simply compute the difference between R_t and R_1 or R_2 which is easily seen to be positive

\frac {R_1 R_2} {R_1 + R_2} - R_1 =

You must have meant negative, the way that difference was written.

For the thread starter: this is a simple way to do it. Just express the second term over the same denominator, and combine terms and cancel stuff out. The end result should be obviously negative. You can then repeat it for ##R_2##.
 
ehild said:
That is a good start. The resistances are all positive, R1, R2 and also Rt.

You know that the reciprocal of the parallel resistances add up:

1/Rt=1/R1+1/R2

Multiply the equation by Rt. ...

ehild

1=Rt/R1+Rt/R2

As both terms on the right-hand side must be positive, both are smaller than 1.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K