Estimate Sun's Rotation Period as a Neutron Star

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the new rotation period of the sun as a neutron star, one must apply the conservation of angular momentum. The initial radius of the sun is 6.96E8 m with a rotation period of 25.3 days, which needs to be converted into seconds for calculations. Using the formula for angular momentum, the relationship between initial and final angular velocities can be established. The final period of rotation can be calculated from the final angular velocity. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the unit "d" in the period, confirming it stands for days.
wildrjetta
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Could someone help me start this problem. My mind it in the angular momentum mode and I am having trouble seeing where to start on this one. :confused:

The sun's radius is 6.96E8m and it rotates with a period of 25.3d. Estimate the new period of rotation of the sun if it collapses with no loss of mass to become a neutron star of radius 5.5km. Give the result in seconds.

Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With the given radius you can find I_{initial} and I_{final}. With the given period, find out \omega_{initial}. Then you use conservation of angular momentum to achieve your answer.
 
as such...(you don't need the moments of inertia exactly because it maintains a spherical shape and same mass so those factor out)

(r_i)^2 \omega_i = (r_f)^2 \omega_f
\omega_f = \frac{(r_i)^2 \omega_i}{(r_f)^2}
T_{new} = \frac{2 \pi}{\omega_f}

follow complete done
 
I calculated two different answers, both of which were to my dismay incorrect...but I am thinking that a conversion error might be the culprit. I am having trouble understanding what "a period of 25.3d" is -- as in, what does "d" stand for...should it be a time unit?
 
in a period d=days
 
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU! to everyone involved in helping with this problem! :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top