Example Problem in the book, why is tension ignored?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an Atwood machine problem involving two masses connected by a cord over a pulley. The original poster questions why the tension in the string is ignored in the provided solution from the textbook, particularly in the context of calculating the acceleration of the masses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the reasoning behind the book's treatment of tension as an internal force that can be ignored. They express confusion over the equations presented and suggest an alternative approach that includes tension in their calculations.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of treating the system as a whole versus breaking it down into separate components, raising questions about the application of angular momentum and torque.
  • Others explore the relationship between angular momentum and inertial frames, questioning the conditions under which certain equations apply.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering insights into the treatment of internal forces and the application of angular momentum concepts. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the problem setup and the assumptions made in the textbook solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem, including the moment of inertia of the pulley and the differing forces acting on the masses. There is an acknowledgment of the potential for multiple approaches to the problem, which may lead to different interpretations of the role of tension.

jzhu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An Atwood machine consists of two masses, M and m, which are connected by an inelastic cord of negligible mass that passes over a pulley. If the pulley has radius R and moment of inertia I about its axle, determine the acceleration of the masses M and m.

Homework Equations


torque = dL/dt
L(angular momentum) = R x v
L = Iω

The Attempt at a Solution



This is the solution in the book. I have no idea why tension of the string is ignored.

L = (m + M)vR + I(v/r) <- this part makes sense to me
torque = mgR - MgR <- this part does not make sense to me

Following the Atwood machine, shouldn't the forces for both m and M be something like
ΣF = F(tension) - mg = ma (differing signs depending on which is going down, of course)[/B]

Instead, the book has it as ΣF = mg

So then since torque is equal to RF, they get that torque = mgR

But my idea is that torque in this case is equal to RF(tension of m) - RF(tension of M)
which would mean that
torque = R(ma + mg) - R(mg - ma)

After this, we just plug torque into the t = dL/dt equation, and with the factored out velocity that we get from the total angular momentum, get acceleration from dv/dt and simple algebra reveals that the answer is a = (m-M)g/(m+M)+I/R^2.

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jzhu said:
L = (m + M)vR + I(v/r) <- this part makes sense to me
jzhu said:
torque = mgR - MgR <- this part does not make sense to me
The book is treating the two masses and pulley as a single system. The tensions in the string would be internal to the system, so they can be ignored.

You can certainly break up the problem and treat the two masses and pulley separately, getting three equations. Then you can solve for the acceleration that way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jzhu
Hm, I just solved it using t = Ia with the 2 forces. So does does mean that dl/dt can only be used from an inertial frame of reference? Or do dl/dt = ia?
 
jzhu said:
Hm, I just solved it using t = Ia with the 2 forces.
If you mean the two tensions, then that's fine. ΣT = Iα

jzhu said:
So does does mean that dl/dt can only be used from an inertial frame of reference? Or do dl/dt = ia?
If you let L = the angular momentum of the pulley only, then dL/dt will equal Iα.
 
Ok, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K