Expansion/Compressibility Coefficients: Carnahan & Starling Model

raintrek
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Homework Equations



Using the Carnahan and Starling equation, estimate the coefficient of volumetric expansion, α, and the coefficient of compressibility, β, defined as

α ≡ 1/V * (δV/δT) [holding P constant] and
β ≡ -1/V * (δV/δP) [holding T constant]

(I've used δ here for partial differentials)

for the hard sphere fluid at a packing fraction η = 0.40.



The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried using Z = PV/nkT and then the CS expression for Z: Z = (1+η+η²-η³) / (1-η)³ however we find α = 1/T and β = 1/P which seems far too easy.

Could someone please offer a suggestion of which direction I should be looking in? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
however we find α = 1/T and β = 1/P which seems far too easy.
I get something different.

for the hard sphere fluid at a packing fraction η = 0.40.

But, the packing fraction \eta is a function of V.

\eta = \frac{ \pi n d^3}{6V}

So, when you use the equation of state to find the partial derivatives holding P or T constant, remember to account for this.
 
Last edited:
hmm, OK, let me see if I'm on the right track here,

setting Z = PV/NkT = (1+η+η²-η³) / (1-η)³
where, as you described, η = pi*N*d³ / 6V

Doing some quick algebra, I get:

V^4 (x) - V³ (1 + 3xy) + V² (3y²x - y²) - V (y³x) + y³ = 0

Where I've said,
x = P / NkT (volume "coefficient" in ideal gas law)
y = N*pi*d³ / 6 (volume "coefficient" in η)

Am I on the right track there, or have I gone completely wrong?! Thanks for your help, siddharth :)
 
Am I on the right track there, or have I gone completely wrong?!
I think so. However, it's easier to work with \eta rather than V. Just express T as a function of p and \eta, calculate the derivative wrt to V (ie, eta) at constant p and then invert it to get your required partial derivative.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top