Experimental Critical Buckling Load

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around determining the experimental critical buckling load of a pinned-ended strut, comparing predicted values from Euler buckling and Perry Robertson with experimental results. Participants explore methods for analyzing experimental data, particularly focusing on identifying the buckling load from recorded displacements.

Discussion Character

  • Experimental/applied
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the method for determining the critical buckling load from experimental data, questioning whether it should be the highest recorded load or derived from a specific formula.
  • Another participant suggests plotting load against axial displacement to identify a "knee" in the curve, indicating the buckling load, while noting that this is not necessarily the highest load recorded.
  • A participant expresses concern about the absence of a clearly defined "knee" in their samples and seeks a more accurate method for identifying it to minimize experimental errors.
  • In response, another participant identifies a specific load range (350-360 Newtons) where a 'knee' is observed in one sample, suggesting inelastic behavior, while noting that other samples do not exhibit the same characteristics.
  • One participant requests additional information about the material properties and geometry of the test specimens, emphasizing the importance of this data for further analysis and questioning the implications of permanent set versus elastic behavior in the context of buckling.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the method for determining the critical buckling load, with differing opinions on the presence and identification of the "knee" in the load-displacement curve. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to analyze the experimental data.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of detailed information about the test specimens and setup, which may affect the interpretation of results. The discussion also highlights the distinction between elastic and plastic deformation in relation to buckling behavior.

KevCah
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I was wondering could I get some help with determining the experimental critical buckling load of a pinned ended strut. I am hoping to compare predicted values from Euler buckling and Perry Robertson to experimental values. I have carried out a experiment where by I applied a axial load to the strut and recorded both the horizontal and vertical displacement. From this data can I apply a formula to give me the critical buckling load? Or is the critical buckling load simply the highest value recorded in the experiment?

Thanks for any help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming that your strut was initially straight (so that it would actually buckle rather than simply bend), then make a plot of load as a function of axial displacement. You should see a pronounced "knee" in the curve. That is the buckling load. It is not the highest load recorded because most post-buckled columns continue to support the load and the load rises slowly.
 
Thanks for the reply,

There is no clearly defined "knee" in some of my samples. Is there anymore accurate way to determine the "knee" rather then doing it by eye? I am just trying to keep my experimental errors to a minimum.

upload_2015-1-14_22-56-12.png
 
KevCah said:
Thanks for the reply,

There is no clearly defined "knee" in some of my samples. Is there anymore accurate way to determine the "knee" rather then doing it by eye? I am just trying to keep my experimental errors to a minimum.

View attachment 77667
If you look at the test results for Sample 1, I would say the 'knee' is clearly defined when the test load is approx. 350-360 Newtons. Where the applied load is relatively constant, the test piece undergoes a measurable change in deflection, which suggests that some sort of inelastic behavior is occurring. The other two samples do not appear to exhibit the same behavior.

Of course, a lot of information about the test pieces and the test set up have not been disclosed.
 
What is the material and what is your geometry (length, width, etc. for the test specimens)?
Did your experiments result in a permanent set, or were they fully elastic? (Buckling is an elastic phenomenon; plastic deformation puts an end to all questions of buckling.)

I don't think we can help you very much without this data.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K