Explain to me Step Functions for VT graphs

AI Thread Summary
Step functions in velocity-time graphs can be confusing, particularly when interpreting average velocities from distance-time graphs. The discussion highlights that the average velocity from 0 to 6 seconds is 30, but the velocity must increase to 60 at t = 6 to achieve this average, indicating a linear change rather than a step. The confusion arises from the expectation of a step in the velocity graph, which is incorrect if the velocity varies continuously. The key takeaway is that if the velocity changes linearly, the graph will not show a step but rather a smooth transition. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately interpreting motion graphs.
kencamarador
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I am sort of confuse about this step functions. In the picture below, the top is the distance time graph and the bottom is velocity time graph. The arrow pointing is what is confusing me. Its not suppose to be a step up (answers in my book) but i calculated the slopes

First curve line = 30
Second straight diagonal line = 60
Second curve line = 35

So I put it in my velocity time graph but the part where the arrow is pointing, isn't that correct though?

But the correct answers show that the first line on the velocity time graph is connected to the horizontal second line.

I am so confuse...

Both graphs have same intervals.

http://imgur.com/52DSmKv

http://imgur.com/52DSmKv
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No graphs are visible!
 
Delphi51 said:
No graphs are visible!

i posted the link

http://imgur.com/52DSmKv
 
The problem is with the first curved line. The average velocity from 0 to 6 is 30, but the velocity is varying from zero at t = 0 to a value higher than 30 at t = 6, in order for the average to be 30. If the velocity is varying linearly with time in this region, then the velocity at t = 6 has to be 60 in order to the average to be 30. Then there won't be any step.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top