Exponential problem: caffeine dosage

jackscholar
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
If the concentration of caffeine in a system at any given time is given by the equation
y(t)=De^-kt
where dy/dt=-kt is the clearence rate (re-arranged and integrated to form the above equation) and the concentration of caffeine in the system at t=0 is D, then calculate k if:
After one hour, 25% of the caffein has been cleared.

I know that y(60)= 3D/4 or three quarters of D
so how do I re-arrange to get k?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jackscholar said:
If the concentration of caffeine in a system at any given time is given by the equation
y(t)=De^-kt
where dy/dt=-kt is the clearence rate (re-arranged and integrated to form the above equation) and the concentration of caffeine in the system at t=0 is D, then calculate k if:
After one hour, 25% of the caffein has been cleared.

I know that y(60)= 3D/4 or three quarters of D
so how do I re-arrange to get k?

y(60)=De^(-k*60). That's equal to 3D/4. It shouldn't be too hard to solve for k if you use a log, is it?
 
OH! I see now. Just subtitute in 3/4D for y(60) then divide by D, take ln of both sides and divide by negative 60. Thank you!
 
jackscholar said:
If the concentration of caffeine in a system at any given time is given by the equation
y(t)=De^-kt
where dy/dt=-kt is the clearence rate (re-arranged and integrated to form the above equation) and the concentration of caffeine in the system at t=0 is D, then calculate k if:
After one hour, 25% of the caffein has been cleared.

I know that y(60)= 3D/4 or three quarters of D
so how do I re-arrange to get k?

Note: dy/dt is NOT equal to -kt; it is equal to -ky.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Back
Top