Field of variable charge distribution over all space

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the potential V(z) and electric field E(z) for a charge distribution with uniform density in the x-y directions and a varying density in the z direction, given by ρ(z) = ρ0e−|z|/t. The user is attempting to set up the integral for the electric field but is uncertain about their approach, particularly regarding the integration limits and the contributions from different components. They express confusion over the resulting integral, which seems to simplify unexpectedly, and seek feedback on their methodology. The conversation highlights the need for clearer communication of mathematical steps and encourages sharing actual calculations for better understanding. The user aims to derive the effective charge density σ in the limit of |z| ≫ t, suggesting a connection to the behavior of a uniform sheet of charge.
BenR
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charge distribution has uniform density in the x-y directions and varies with z according to: ρ(z) = ρ0e−|z|/t

where ρ0 and t are constants.

(a) Find the potential V (z) and the electric field E(z)

(b) Sketch them clearly showing their behaviors in the regions |z| ≪ t and |z| ≫ t.

(c) In the region |z| ≫ t, the system should behave as if there were a uniform sheet of charge. Find the effective charge density σ.

Homework Equations


I am not certain I'm setting up the integral for the field correctly. This is what I've set up as the integrand (I'm doing this on my phone and will do my best to be clear).

1/4pi(epsilon naught)•(rho(z)•(z-z naught) dx dy dz)/(x^2+y^2+(z-z naught)^2)^(3/2).

This is all times z hat, and integrated from
-L to L, after which I will take the limits as L goes to infinity.

I have obviously discarded x and y hats, because the charge is uniform in those directions and the non- z components will cancel, but should contribute something in the z direction. The quantity raised to the three halves is the separation vector times the denominator of the unit vector r (only the z component of which survived in the numerator).

What I'm getting is a x/sqrt(x^2+(yz terms)), and factoring out a x from under the radical and taking x to positive and negative infinity I get 1.

Left over(ignoring constants in front) is rho(z) (z-znaught)dydz/(y^2+(z-znaught)^2)

Integrating over y, I get rho(z)•(z-znaught)•1/(z-znaught)•arctan (1/y) which when evaluated from negative to positive infinity gives me pi.

So now I'm left with an integral of just rho(z) with no terms for distance which seems strange.

The Attempt at a Solution


I guess I put my attempt above. Oops. At any rate, is this a sensible way to go about this? I suppose considering I'm essentially integrating over expanding spheres a term of pi makes sense, but I can't find any similar examples to corroborate my approach. I haven't attempted the second and third parts yet but who knows what that will yield. I'd appreciate any critique or suggestions regarding methodology or set up, whether my approach is yielding what looks like a correct answer or not (it seems somewhat cumbersome but maybe it just is). In the future I will try to actually format this on my phone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not tried following your hard-won alphanumeric equations, but what I don't see is any reference to the field at a point from an infinite uniformly charged plate. That would seem to be a useful starting point.
 
I mean... That's what I'm getting basically. I'm left with rho(z)/epsilon, and rho(0) gives me a constant which would be the surface charge density for any plane normal to the z axis. So now integrating z over infinity should yield a sensible answer
 
BenR said:
I mean... That's what I'm getting basically. I'm left with rho(z)/epsilon, and rho(0) gives me a constant which would be the surface charge density for any plane normal to the z axis. So now integrating z over infinity should yield a sensible answer
Sorry, but I can't follow what you are saying there. It would be clearer if you would post your actual working.
What is the charge density of a plate of thickness dz, normal to the z axis, passing through the ordinate z?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top