Find Heat Energy Needed to Expand Gas to Triple Volume

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the heat energy needed to triple the volume of 0.40 mol of oxygen gas at constant pressure, the ideal gas law and heat transfer equations were applied. The initial calculations yielded an incorrect energy value of 3211 kJ, while the correct answer is approximately 6.4 kJ. The error stemmed from using the wrong unit for molar mass, specifically grams per mole instead of kilograms per mole. The correct formula for heat transfer in an isobaric process was confirmed to be Q = m C_P ΔT. The final calculations, using the correct units, provided the accurate energy required for the expansion.
Munir M
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When 0.40 mol of oxygen(O2) gas is heated at constant pressure starting at 0 degrees C, how much energy must be added to the gas as heat to triple its volume? (The molecules rotate but do not oscillate)

Homework Equations


pV=nRT
p1V1/T1=p2V2/T2
Q=mcdT
Value of Cp for Oxygen I used is 0.919 kJ/kg K

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the equation pV=nRT to get the value of pV at 273K which was pV=907.5. I tripled that value to get 2722.5. Then, using p1V1/T1=p2V2/T2, I plugged in the values to get the final temperature(819K). From that I used Q=mcdT which gave me the answer of 3211kJ. The answer in the back was 6.4 kJ.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must have missed a conversion factor somewhere, your temperatures are correct. For an isobaric process and constant heat capacity:
Q= \Delta H = m C_P \Delta T
Q = 0.4 \ mol \left(0.032 \frac{kg}{mol} \right) \left( 0.919 \frac{kJ}{kg \cdot K} \right) (819.45 \ K - 273.15 \ K) = 6.426 \ kJ
 
MexChemE said:
You must have missed a conversion factor somewhere, your temperatures are correct. For an isobaric process and constant heat capacity:
Q= \Delta H = m C_P \Delta T
Q = 0.4 \ mol \left(0.032 \frac{kg}{mol} \right) \left( 0.919 \frac{kJ}{kg \cdot K} \right) (819.45 \ K - 273.15 \ K) = 6.426 \ kJ

My mistake was using gmol-1 instead of kgmol-1 for the molar mass. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top