Find Load in AD, BD, and DC: Solving Homework Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter goldfish9776
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Load
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a homework problem involving loads in structural members AD, BD, and DC. The initial equations provided are insufficient to solve for all unknowns due to the complexity of the system. Participants emphasize the importance of applying the equations of static equilibrium and analyzing the structure's geometry to determine member lengths and forces. Clarifications are made regarding the nature of tension and compression in structural members, as well as the validity of calculating moments about specific axes versus points. The conversation highlights the need for careful diagram analysis and the correct application of mechanical principles to arrive at a solution.
goldfish9776
Messages
310
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I am asked to find the load in AD, BD, and DC...
I have AD(2/surd38) +BD(2/surd29)=800
AD(3/surd38)=DC
I can only formed two equation... But , so many unknown... How to solve this?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's the diagram
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20151026_154049.jpg
    IMG_20151026_154049.jpg
    34.5 KB · Views: 434
goldfish9776 said:

Homework Statement


I am asked to find the load in AD, BD, and DC...
I have AD(2/surd38) +BD(2/surd29)=800
AD(3/surd38)=DC
I can only formed two equation... But , so many unknown... How to solve this?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

Instead of just writing down a random equation, you should:

1. Write down the known information in a logical order
2. Write the general equations of static equilibrium (ΣF = 0; ΣM = 0)
3. Analyze the problem to determine if there are simplifications or special conditions which may apply.
4. Write the equations of equilibrium for this problem.
5. Solve these equations to determine the unknown reactions / internal loads.

For this problem, you could first calculate and write down the lengths of the members involved: the bar BD and the lines AD and CD.
Step 2 is pretty much taken care of.
Step 3: The bar BD can take either tension or compression. The lines AD and CD look like they can take only tension. There is only one applied load of 800 kN.

Here's the critical step:

Write the equations of equilibrium for this structure after completing steps 1-3.
 
SteamKing said:
Instead of just writing down a random equation, you should:

1. Write down the known information in a logical order
2. Write the general equations of static equilibrium (ΣF = 0; ΣM = 0)
3. Analyze the problem to determine if there are simplifications or special conditions which may apply.
4. Write the equations of equilibrium for this problem.
5. Solve these equations to determine the unknown reactions / internal loads.

For this problem, you could first calculate and write down the lengths of the members involved: the bar BD and the lines AD and CD.
Step 2 is pretty much taken care of.
Step 3: The bar BD can take either tension or compression. The lines AD and CD look like they can take only tension. There is only one applied load of 800 kN.

Here's the critical step:

Write the equations of equilibrium for this structure after completing steps 1-3.
how do u knw The bar BD can take either tension or compression. The lines AD and CD look like they can take only tension??since this is an exercise that involves 3D , then we can only consider moment about x , y and z axis , right ? we can't consider moment about a specific point ?
 
Last edited:
goldfish9776 said:
how do u knw The bar BD can take either tension or compression. The lines AD and CD look like they can take only tension??

Because that's the nature of stiff members like bars. Bars can be stretched in tension, compressed, even bent by applying moments to the ends.

Ropes and wires can only sustain tension loads. Repeat after me: You can't push on a rope.

I'm curious: haven't you ever tried to build anything from scratch, played with Tinker Toys, hung a picture on a wall with a nail and some wire, heck even picked up a stick?
This is how we learn about the mechanical nature of different things, like bars, strings, rope, and the like. There's more to experience in life than banging keys on a keyboard.

since this is an exercise that involves 3D , then we can only consider moment about x , y and z axis , right ? we can't consider moment about a specific point ?

I don't know what "moment about a point" means. You can evaluate moments only about an axis.
 
SteamKing said:
Because that's the nature of stiff members like bars. Bars can be stretched in tension, compressed, even bent by applying moments to the ends.

Ropes and wires can only sustain tension loads. Repeat after me: You can't push on a rope.

I'm curious: haven't you ever tried to build anything from scratch, played with Tinker Toys, hung a picture on a wall with a nail and some wire, heck even picked up a stick?
This is how we learn about the mechanical nature of different things, like bars, strings, rope, and the like. There's more to experience in life than banging keys on a keyboard.
I don't know what "moment about a point" means. You can evaluate moments only about an axis.

moment about a point means we simply pick a point , and claculate the moment at it . For example , we take the point A , and we calculate the moment ( force x distance ) about it .
 
goldfish9776 said:
moment about a point means we simply pick a point , and claculate the moment at it . For example , we take the point A , and we calculate the moment ( force x distance ) about it .
You can calculate moments about an axis which passes thru a point, but you can't calculate moments about a single point. :wink:

In any event, have you progressed any further with your analysis of this problem?
 
SteamKing said:
You can calculate moments about an axis which passes thru a point, but you can't calculate moments about a single point. :wink:

In any event, have you progressed any further with your analysis of this problem?
I have ΣFx = -AD(5/surd38) -BD(5/surd29) =0
ΣFy = AD(3/surd38)-DC=0
ΣFz= BD(2/surd29) +AD(2/surd38) -800= 0
 
goldfish9776 said:
I have ΣFx = -AD(5/surd38) -BD(5/surd29) =0
ΣFy = AD(3/surd38)-DC=0
ΣFz= BD(2/surd29) +AD(2/surd38) -800= 0
You might want to check the x, y and z-components of AD and the length of AD.
 
  • #10
SteamKing said:
You might want to check the x, y and z-components of AD and the length of AD.
i couldn't see what's wrong with it
 
  • #11
goldfish9776 said:
i couldn't see what's wrong with it
Look again at the diagram carefully. The length you have calculated for line AD is incorrect.

What's the location of point A?
 
  • #12
SteamKing said:
Look again at the diagram carefully. The length you have calculated for line AD is incorrect.

What's the location of point A?
The z coordinate for B is 2, for A is 4?
 
  • #13
goldfish9776 said:
The z coordinate for B is 2, for A is 4?
And the length of line AD is?
 
  • #14
SteamKing said:
And the length of line AD is?
Surd50... The diagram is unclear
 
  • #15
SteamKing said:
And the length of line AD is?
Surd50... The diagram is unclear
 
  • #16
goldfish9776 said:
Surd50... The diagram is unclear
Seemed pretty clear to me. :wink:
 
  • #17
The 2 m looks like B to Z
SteamKing said:
Seemed pretty clear to me. :wink:
 
  • #18
goldfish9776 said:
The 2 m looks like B to Z
The dashed lines have some significance in the diagram here.

There is no purpose in locating the position of the letter Z; there is a purpose in locating the position of point A.
 
  • #19
SteamKing said:
I don't know what "moment about a point" means. You can evaluate moments only about an axis.

here's a case . it give the moment about the x , y , x' and y' axis ... but not moment about a specific point
 

Attachments

  • 02.png
    02.png
    87.6 KB · Views: 372
  • 01.png
    01.png
    52.8 KB · Views: 347
  • #20
so when we are asked to find the moemnt for a question involving 3D model , we can only use the moemnt about a specific axis to find the moment ? but not a specific point ? (for example. in the above case , we cannot find the moment about the O ( centroid) ) ?
 
  • #21
SteamKing said:
I don't know what "moment about a point" means. You can evaluate moments only about an axis.
No, moment about a point is valid. It will be a vector, defining its own axis.
When you take moments about a selected axis, you get the component of the full moment vector parallel to that axis.
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Re =post #20: That's right. In 3D there are a lot of rotation axes you can think of for O, so you have to specify which one.

Haru is right in post #21 in the sense that one can add moment vectors. The result is a sum moment with a sum axis. But for your exercise it's more effective to look at the magnitudes of the moments about separate axes one by one. No rotation means they all need to be 0.

Are you in the same class as @werson tan ?
 
Back
Top