Find the coordinate where net electric field is 0

AI Thread Summary
To find the coordinate where the net electric field is zero between two charges, the equation E1 + E2 = 0 is used, leading to the relationship that the distance from one charge must be twice that from the other. The calculations yield two potential solutions: x = -30 cm and x = 36.67 cm. The first solution aligns with the book, while the second raises questions about its validity. The discussion clarifies that the net electric field can indeed be zero at multiple points, depending on the distances from the charges. Understanding the behavior of electric fields from opposite charges is crucial in determining these points.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



Two particles are fixed to an x axis, particle 1 of charge q1 = 2.1x10^-7 C at x = 20cm and particle 2 of charge q2 = -4.00q1 at x = 70cm. At what coordinates on the axis is the net electric field produced equal to 0?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First, I noted that E1 + E2 = 0, so E1 = -E2.

Then, factoring out k = 8.99x10^9, I am left with:

\frac{q_{1}}{r^{2}_{1}} = -\frac{q_{2}}{r^{2}_{2}}
\frac{q_{1}}{r^{2}_{1}} = \frac{4q_{1}}{r^{2}_{2}}
\frac{r_{2}}{r_{1}} = 2

I interpreted this to mean that the charge must be twice as far from q2 as it is from q1.

So then,

x - 70 = 2(x-20)
x = -30cm


Which is what the book says, but in my method there are other solutions too, like

x - 70 = 2(20-x)
x = 36.6666

Are these other solutions valid? Can the coordinate be ANY such that it is twice as far from q2 as it is from q1?

I may have solved this in a weird way, its because I'm doing it on my own and didn't take the class yet.

Thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1MileCrash said:

Homework Statement



Two particles are fixed to an x axis, particle 1 of charge q1 = 2.1x10^-7 C at x = 20cm and particle 2 of charge q2 = -4.00q1 at x = 70cm. At what coordinates on the axis is the net electric field produced equal to 0?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



First, I noted that E1 + E2 = 0, so E1 = -E2.

Then, factoring out k = 8.99x10^9, I am left with:

\frac{q_{1}}{r^{2}_{1}} = -\frac{q_{2}}{r^{2}_{2}}
\frac{q_{1}}{r^{2}_{1}} = \frac{4q_{1}}{r^{2}_{2}}
\frac{r_{2}}{r_{1}} = 2

I interpreted this to mean that the charge must be twice as far from q2 as it is from q1.

So then,

x - 70 = 2(x-20)
x = -30cm

Which is what the book says, but in my method there are other solutions too, like

x - 70 = 2(20-x)
x = 36.6666

Are these other solutions valid? Can the coordinate be ANY such that it is twice as far from q2 as it is from q1?

I may have solved this in a weird way, its because I'm doing it on my own and didn't take the class yet.

Thanks again!
Technically, you're just finding the locations at which the magnitude of the electric force due to each of the charges is equal.

If the charges have the same sign, then the fields cancel somewhere between the charges.

If the charges have opposite sign, then the fields cancel somewhere on either side of the charges.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top