OmCheeto
Gold Member
- 2,530
- 3,624
Would introducing Kirchhoff's voltage law make the problem too easy to solve?
Not any more. Looks a lot differrent from the circuit in post #1 !Helly123 said:View attachment 216507 For this matter, what everyone think, that BD is short circuit or not?
How do I manage to get this arithmetic wrong?! Yes we could just say the current through the 3 Ω resistor is ##\frac{9.6}{3}## = 3.2 A, and then the flow through the 9 Ω resistor is a third as much = (1 + 0.2/3) adding up to (4.2 + 0.2/3) = 4.26666... ≈ 4.27 A as you say. 
Just a note - working in fractions, or just exact for that matter, is very nice in mathematics, but when solving basic physics problems like these, i see no benefit - it can even obscure the result which with a reduced fraction givs 64/15 A. This does not give an intuitive knowledge of the 'normal' kind of values for these problems.gneill said:If you want to work in fractions, write 9.6 as 96/10, then work through the fractions. Thus:
##I = \frac{96}{10} \left( \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{9} \right)\;A##
gneill said:If you want to work in fractions, write 9.6 as 96/10, then work through the fractions. Thus:
##I = \frac{96}{10} \left( \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{9} \right)\;A##
aa_o said:Just a note - working in fractions, or just exact for that matter, is very nice in mathematics, but when solving basic physics problems like these, i see no benefit - it can even obscure the result which with a reduced fraction givs 64/15 A. This does not give an intuitive knowledge of the 'normal' kind of values for these problems.

When you're comfortable with fractions, then I feel that the fraction result conveys the same information. Besides, you can always reduce the final result to a decimal version quickly enough.aa_o said:Just a note - working in fractions, or just exact for that matter, is very nice in mathematics, but when solving basic physics problems like these, i see no benefit - it can even obscure the result which with a reduced fraction givs 64/15 A. This does not give an intuitive knowledge of the 'normal' kind of values for these problems.
Then I would highly recommend working symbolically, since this elucidates the relationships between the quantities in the configuration much clearer than does fractions. And this, too, will of course give the exact result if wished in the end.gneill said:When you're comfortable with fractions, then I feel that the fraction result conveys the same information. Besides, you can always reduce the final result to a decimal version quickly enough.
Of course. Work symbolically as much as possible. In the end you'll still have an expression that needs to have values substituted and the math performed.aa_o said:Then I would highly recommend working symbolically, since this elucidates the relationships between the quantities in the configuration much clearer than does fractions. And this, too, will of course give the exact result if wished in the end.
The #1 diagramBvU said:Of which diagram ?

Can you draw a line from B to D without going through any components?Helly123 said:Thanks guys. How about this? View attachment 216636
Is the BD short circuit (jumper wire)?
I suppose, i can not, it goes through AB. Isnt it?aa_o said:Can you draw a line from B to D without going through any components?
Yes, so it is not shorted.Helly123 said:I suppose, i can not, it goes through AB. Isnt it?
View attachment 216636aa_o said:Yes, so it is not shorted.
Let's ask this in another way. Is the voltage the same at both sides of the resistor?Helly123 said:
Asymptotic said:In this drawing it's the same for connections between RA and RB. The only component with a voltage drop across it is the 9 ohm resistor RC.