Find the current I in this electrical circuit

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
52 replies · 5K views
Would introducing Kirchhoff's voltage law make the problem too easy to solve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Helly123 said:
View attachment 216507 For this matter, what everyone think, that BD is short circuit or not?
Not any more. Looks a lot differrent from the circuit in post #1 !

Here you simply draw the top right quarter circle as a horizontal line, erect the 6 ##\Omega## and see that it's parallel to the other 6 ##\Omega##
VDC= 6 V and Bob is the brother of your mother
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helly123
:headbang: How do I manage to get this arithmetic wrong?! Yes we could just say the current through the 3 Ω resistor is ##\frac{9.6}{3}## = 3.2 A, and then the flow through the 9 Ω resistor is a third as much = (1 + 0.2/3) adding up to (4.2 + 0.2/3) = 4.26666... ≈ 4.27 A as you say. :blushing:
 
If you want to work in fractions, write 9.6 as 96/10, then work through the fractions. Thus:

##I = \frac{96}{10} \left( \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{9} \right)\;A##
 
gneill said:
If you want to work in fractions, write 9.6 as 96/10, then work through the fractions. Thus:

##I = \frac{96}{10} \left( \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{9} \right)\;A##
Just a note - working in fractions, or just exact for that matter, is very nice in mathematics, but when solving basic physics problems like these, i see no benefit - it can even obscure the result which with a reduced fraction givs 64/15 A. This does not give an intuitive knowledge of the 'normal' kind of values for these problems.
 
gneill said:
If you want to work in fractions, write 9.6 as 96/10, then work through the fractions. Thus:

##I = \frac{96}{10} \left( \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{9} \right)\;A##

Yeah I thought of that too.

aa_o said:
Just a note - working in fractions, or just exact for that matter, is very nice in mathematics, but when solving basic physics problems like these, i see no benefit - it can even obscure the result which with a reduced fraction givs 64/15 A. This does not give an intuitive knowledge of the 'normal' kind of values for these problems.

I used to think that too. :oldbiggrin:
 
aa_o said:
Just a note - working in fractions, or just exact for that matter, is very nice in mathematics, but when solving basic physics problems like these, i see no benefit - it can even obscure the result which with a reduced fraction givs 64/15 A. This does not give an intuitive knowledge of the 'normal' kind of values for these problems.
When you're comfortable with fractions, then I feel that the fraction result conveys the same information. Besides, you can always reduce the final result to a decimal version quickly enough.
 
gneill said:
When you're comfortable with fractions, then I feel that the fraction result conveys the same information. Besides, you can always reduce the final result to a decimal version quickly enough.
Then I would highly recommend working symbolically, since this elucidates the relationships between the quantities in the configuration much clearer than does fractions. And this, too, will of course give the exact result if wished in the end.
 
aa_o said:
Then I would highly recommend working symbolically, since this elucidates the relationships between the quantities in the configuration much clearer than does fractions. And this, too, will of course give the exact result if wished in the end.
Of course. Work symbolically as much as possible. In the end you'll still have an expression that needs to have values substituted and the math performed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aa_o
If the 3 ohm and 9 ohm were series, then we found the answer 0,8 A which is on the options... so the 3 ohm and 9 ohm not series but parallel?
 
BvU said:
Of which diagram ?
The #1 diagram
 
You can see that they are en parallel, since both of the resistor terminals (of the 3 and 9 ohm resistors) share the same nodes.
If there's no option for giving around 4.27 A as an answer, there is a mistake in the options.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
This one

upload_2017-12-12_9-19-35.png


equals
upload_2017-12-12_9-20-2.png

equals
upload_2017-12-12_9-21-5.png
Which for some unspecified reason still shows a resistor between B and C in the post but not in the picture attached (below riight) ?:)

Obviously parallel , right ?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-12_9-19-35.png
    upload_2017-12-12_9-19-35.png
    43.2 KB · Views: 428
  • upload_2017-12-12_9-20-2.png
    upload_2017-12-12_9-20-2.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 420
  • upload_2017-12-12_9-20-23.png
    upload_2017-12-12_9-20-23.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 476
  • upload_2017-12-12_9-21-5.png
    upload_2017-12-12_9-21-5.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 429
  • upload_2017-12-12_9-21-48.png
    upload_2017-12-12_9-21-48.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 468
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helly123 and Asymptotic
Yet another way to think about it.

Circular-resistance3.jpg


If this handful of resistors and 9.6V battery were wired together it would be as though a jumper wire was connected across the 6Ω resistor.

What are the current path(s)?

A useful formula valid when two (and only two!) resistors are connected in parallel is Rt=(Ra*Rb)/(Ra+Rb).
 

Attachments

  • Circular-resistance3.jpg
    Circular-resistance3.jpg
    15.3 KB · Views: 411
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helly123
Thanks guys. How about this?
k1vt6b.jpg


Is the 6o hm (A) short circuit (jumper wire)?

8zr5gm.jpg


Is the BD short circuit (jumper wire)?
 

Attachments

  • k1vt6b.jpg
    k1vt6b.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 834
  • 8zr5gm.jpg
    8zr5gm.jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 390
Helly123 said:
Thanks guys. How about this? View attachment 216636
Is the BD short circuit (jumper wire)?
Can you draw a line from B to D without going through any components?
 
aa_o said:
Can you draw a line from B to D without going through any components?
I suppose, i can not, it goes through AB. Isnt it?
 
Helly123 said:
I suppose, i can not, it goes through AB. Isnt it?
Yes, so it is not shorted.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helly123
aa_o said:
Yes, so it is not shorted.
View attachment 216636

Is the 6o hm (A) short circuit (jumper wire)?
 
Last edited:
Helly123 said:
View attachment 216636

Is the 6o hm (A) short circuit (jumper wire)?
Let's ask this in another way. Is the voltage the same at both sides of the resistor?

Start at the positive battery terminal, and trace the circuit with your finger ...
Label the 6 ohm resistor "RA", one side of the resistor Z, and the other side Z'.
What is the voltage at Z?
9.6 volts.

And at Z'?
Also, 9.6 volts.

CircRes1.jpg


What does Ohm's law tell us? If the voltage is the same at both sides of the resistor (that is, voltage drop across the resistor is zero) then IRA=VRA/RA = 0 volts/6 ohms = 0 amps.

In effect, 6 ohm resistor RA is shorted by the "wire" between point Z and Z'.

In this drawing it's the same for connections between RA and RB. The only component with a voltage drop across it is the 9 ohm resistor RC.

Let's re-state the problem in yet another way.
RA is a 6 ohm resistor in parallel with a 0 ohm wire between point Z and Z'.
The general rule is that total resistance for two resistors in parallel is less than the smaller resistor. In this special case the smaller resistor is 0 ohms, and limits total resistance to 0 ohms.
 

Attachments

  • CircRes1.jpg
    CircRes1.jpg
    35 KB · Views: 446
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Helly123
Thank you for the explanation :)
 
Asymptotic said:
In this drawing it's the same for connections between RA and RB. The only component with a voltage drop across it is the 9 ohm resistor RC.

So both A and B are short circuit, because the voltage stream in left side and right side are zero. I see.