Find the magnitude of the torque

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonnejon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnitude Torque
AI Thread Summary
To find the torque about point P from a 68 lb force, the initial calculation used t = (4)(68)(sin30), resulting in 136. However, there is a suggestion to consider the distance as 4√2 and the perpendicular component of the force as F*cos15°. A critique highlights that the torque equation should be expressed in vector form using the cross product, rather than a scalar calculation. This approach would provide a more accurate torque value and its magnitude. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of using vector calculations for torque to ensure precision.
jonnejon
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the magnitude of the torque about P if a 68 lb force is applied as shown. Give your answer correct to the nearest integer.
12-4-40.gif

Homework Equations


t=r X F

The Attempt at a Solution


t = (4)(68)(sin30)
= 136
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Don't you want to consider the distance at which it is acting is 4*√2 ?

At the point of interaction then the ⊥ component of F looks to me like F*Cos15°
 


jonnejon said:

Homework Statement


Find the magnitude of the torque about P if a 68 lb force is applied as shown. Give your answer correct to the nearest integer.
12-4-40.gif



Homework Equations


t=r X F


The Attempt at a Solution


t = (4)(68)(sin30)
= 136


You wrote what must have been intended to be a vector equation for the torque, t = r x F, because the cross product only makes sense if t, r, and F are all expressed as vectors. But then you proceeded to do a scalar calculation. Why not make your torque calculation in vector form using the determinant expression for the cross product and giving the resulting torque as a vector? Then if you need the magnitude of that vector, dot it with itself and take the square root of the result.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top