Find The Percent Change In K.E. Of Rod Hit By Putty

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the percentage of kinetic energy lost during an inelastic collision between a rod and a piece of putty. The problem involves a rod of mass M and length L, which is struck by putty of the same mass moving with velocity V. Key calculations include the velocity of the center of mass (CoM) after the collision, angular momentum before the collision, and the angular velocity after the collision. The final conclusion is that 20% of kinetic energy is lost, and angular momentum is conserved due to the absence of external torques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inelastic collisions and conservation laws
  • Familiarity with angular momentum and its conservation
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy calculations for linear and rotational motion
  • Application of the Parallel Axis Theorem for moment of inertia
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of inelastic collisions in detail
  • Learn about the conservation of angular momentum in various systems
  • Explore the Parallel Axis Theorem and its applications in physics
  • Investigate kinetic energy transformations in rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mechanics, particularly those studying collisions and energy conservation in rigid body dynamics.

XanMan
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to solve this problem, however I'm unsure if my reasoning is correct - I do agree with the answer, but something seems wrong to me in my reasoning.

1. Homework Statement

A rod is on a frictionless surface, and is defined by the length L and mass M. It is hit on one end by a piece of putty, also of mass M, with a velocity V. The putty sticks to the rod and there is an inelastic collision between the two (of very short duration). What is the percentage of Kinetic Energy is lost during the collision?

The question has 3 more parts before the percentage bit. I shall highlight them briefly:
i) Find the velocity of the CoM before and after the collision: ##\frac{V}{2}##
ii) Find the angular momentum about the CoM before the collision: ##L = \frac{MVL}{4}##
iii) Find the angular velocity about the CoM after the collision: ##\omega = \frac{6V}{5L}##

I worked out iii) using the conservation of angular momentum, which I am unsure if it is the correct way. The rod has no form of pivot, it will rotate about its centre of mass. However it will also have linear motion. Due to the inelastic collision, I know that linear momentum is conserved. However, is angular momentum conserved?

Homework Equations


[/B]
I found the CoM to be located at ##\frac{3L}{4}##
$$Total KE = Linear KE + Rotational KE$$
$$Linear KE = \frac{MV^2}{2}$$
$$Rotational KE = \frac{I \omega ^2}{2} = \frac{L \omega}{2}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Before collision there is no Rotational KE. Moreover, only the putty is in motion in the system. Thus the KE Before is found using the mass of the putty and its velocity.

$$KE_{Before} = \frac{MV^2}{2}$$

The KE After is a combination of Linear and Rotational KE. Let's work them out in two separate parts.

a) Linear KE:

The velocity of the CoM after collision is ##\frac{V}{2}## and the combined mass is ##2M##. Thus:

$$Linear KE = \frac{MV^2}{4}$$

b) Rotational KE:

We must first find the moment of inertia about the CoM. The moment of inertia of the system about the other end of the rod is:

$$I = I_{Rod} + I_{Putty} = \frac{ML^2}{3} + ML^2 = \frac{4ML^2}{3}$$

By Parallel Axis Theorem:

$$I_{CoM} = I - M_T X_{CoM}^2 = \frac{4ML^2}{3} - \frac{18ML^2}{16} = \frac{5ML^2}{24}$$

Finding the Rotational KE:

$$Rotational KE = \frac{I \omega ^2}{2} = \frac{3MV^2}{20}$$

Thus:

$$KE_{After} = \frac{MV^2}{4} + \frac{3MV^2}{24} = \frac{2MV^2}{5}$$

We're almost there! Huzzah!

By finding the difference between the KE Before and KE After, one sees that the percentage difference is 20%.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
XanMan said:
However, is angular momentum conserved?
Definitely. There are no external torques, so angular momentum about the CoM will be conserved.

Your solution looks good to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: XanMan
Doc Al said:
Definitely. There are no external torques, so angular momentum about the CoM will be conserved.

Your solution looks good to me.

Thanks Doc Al! All the best for the new year.
 

Similar threads

Replies
335
Views
16K
Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K