Finding Acceleration: Motorist Travels 0.2km in 45-99km/h

  • Thread starter Thread starter adoado
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
A motorist accelerates from 45 km/h to 99 km/h over a distance of 0.2 km. The initial calculation for acceleration using the formula v2 = u2 + 2as resulted in an incorrect value of 5400 m/sec². Participants suggest converting all units to meters and seconds before applying the formula for accuracy. The discussion emphasizes the importance of unit consistency in calculations. Proper unit conversion is crucial for obtaining the correct acceleration value.
adoado
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A motorist enters a freeway at 45km/h and accelerates uniformly to 99 km/h. From the odometer of the car, the driver knows she has traveled 0.2km. Find the acceleration of the car.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted this:

v2 = u2 + 2as

Substituting the values in I got this:
(992 -452)/0.4 = a

this gives 19440, so converting to m/sec I think I get 5400 m/sec2

This is definitely not right, any ideas why?

Cheers,
Adrian :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
adoado said:
this gives 19440, so converting to m/sec I think I get 5400 m/sec2
What units do you think the 19440 would be in? Check your conversion.

The best thing to do is change units to m/s and m before you use them in the formula.
 
Got it! Thanks a bunch!

Cheers,
Adrian
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top