Finding Electric Field of Two Charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field created by two charges: a positive charge of 1 μC at x=0 and a negative charge of -0.5 μC at x=4 m. The key problem is determining where the electric field is zero, leading to confusion in the calculations. The user initially arrives at an incorrect answer, mistakenly introducing an extra factor of 2 in their final expression. The solution involves correctly applying the relationship between the charges and their distances to find the accurate position where the electric field equals zero. Clarifications are provided on the proper manipulation of equations to isolate the variable r.
erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a charge Q=1 μC located at x=0 and a charge -Q/2 located at x=4 m. What is the E-field.

At what value of x is the E-field zero? Express your answer in meters and do not approximate decimals digits.

Homework Equations



E=\frac{q_1 q_2 k_c}{r^2}

Removing the test charge:

\frac{E}{q}=\frac{q_n k_c}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



I have this solved, but I am going wrong somewhere and can't see my mistake. Here is my work and the correct final answer.

To find the E field at x=100, E1-E2=0. E2 is being subtracted due to q2 being negative.

This gives E1=E2

\frac{q_1 k_c}{r^2}=\frac{q_2 k_c}{(r-4^2)}

\frac{(r-4)^2}{r^2}=\frac{q_2 k_c}{q_1 k_c}

\left(\frac{(r-4)}{r}\right)^2=\frac{q_2 k_c}{q_1 k_c}

\frac{r-4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}}

1-\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}}

-1\left(-\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}} -1\right)

\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}} +1

\frac{r}{4}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_1}{q_2}} +1

r= \left(\pm \sqrt{\frac{q_1}{q_2}} +1\right)4

r= \pm 4\sqrt{\frac{q_1}{q_2}} +4

r= 4 \pm 4\sqrt{\frac{1}{0.5}}

r= 4 + 4 \sqrt{2}


But that isn't correct. That isn't the correct answer. The correct answer is:

r= 8 + 4 \sqrt{2}

Where does the extra factor of 2 come from making the 4 an 8?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
erok81 said:

Homework Statement



There is a charge Q=1 μC located at x=0 and a charge -Q/2 located at x=4 m. What is the E-field.

At what value of x is the E-field zero? Express your answer in meters and do not approximate decimals digits.

Homework Equations



E=\frac{q_1 q_2 k_c}{r^2}

Removing the test charge:

\frac{E}{q}=\frac{q_n k_c}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



I have this solved, but I am going wrong somewhere and can't see my mistake. Here is my work and the correct final answer.

To find the E field at x=100, E1-E2=0. E2 is being subtracted due to q2 being negative.

This gives E1=E2

\frac{q_1 k_c}{r^2}=\frac{q_2 k_c}{(r-4^2)}

\frac{(r-4)^2}{r^2}=\frac{q_2 k_c}{q_1 k_c}

\left(\frac{(r-4)}{r}\right)^2=\frac{q_2 k_c}{q_1 k_c}

\frac{r-4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}}

1-\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}}

-1\left(-\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}} -1\right)

\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}} +1

\frac{r}{4}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_1}{q_2}} +1

You made a mistake. The red line is wrong.

ehild
 
I am assuming I can't take the inverse of that thing like I did?

Would the more appropriate solution to cross multiply everything to get r alone?
 
hi erok81! :smile:
erok81 said:
Would the more appropriate solution to cross multiply everything to get r alone?

that'll still leave you with the problem of what the inverse of the RHS is :redface:

hint: 1 = √q1/√q1 :wink:
 
Last edited:
erok81 said:
I am assuming I can't take the inverse of that thing like I did?

Would the more appropriate solution to cross multiply everything to get r alone?


You can not. Try it with numbers: if 1/r = 2/3 +1
=5/3
is r=3/2 +1
=5/2?
?

You can take the reciprocal of both sides of an equation if neither sides can be zero. If

4/r =a+b

then

r/4=1/(a+b)

Multiply both sides by 4:

r=4/(a+b)

Your equation is

\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{\frac{q_2}{q_1}} +1

Substitute the numerical values of the charges q2=Q/2 and q1=Q.

\frac{4}{r}= \pm \sqrt{1/2} +1

Take the reciprocal of both sides.


ehild
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top