Finding the accuracy of an approximated potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter Electroguru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accuracy Potential
Electroguru
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Charges +/- q separated by a distance d make a dipole with dipole moment qd. For large r the potential approaches qdcosθ/(4πε0r²). For θ=0, how large must r be so that the asymptotic function is accurate to 1%?

Homework Equations


Exact V= q1/(4πε0r) + q2 /(4πε0r)
Approximate V= qdcosθ/(4πε0r²)

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that the following statement must be true:
Vexact - Vapproximate ≤ 1.0%(Vexact)

q1/(4πε0r) + q2 /(4πε0(r-d)) - qdcosθ/(4πε0r²) ≤ 1.0 %.

If we cancel all like constants;
1/r - 1/(r-d) - d/r²) ≤ 1.0 %

I do not understand where to go from here, or even if my approach towards this is correct.

Thank you in advance to all those who are reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think they meant for you to have the two charges at +d/2 and -d/2. When you get the two fractions, you should reduce them to a common denominator. Then, you might get an idea what to do next.

Chet
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top