Finding the Angle of a 2kg Block on a Slippery Plane

AI Thread Summary
To determine the angle at which a 2kg block slides down a slippery plane at a constant speed, the coefficient of friction is given as 0.41. The relationship between the angle and the coefficient of friction can be expressed as tan(angle) = coefficient of friction, leading to an angle of approximately 23 degrees. A free-body diagram helps visualize the forces, including weight and normal force, but the weight information may not be essential for solving the problem. The discussion emphasizes deriving formulas from fundamental principles rather than memorizing them. Understanding the components of forces is crucial for solving such physics problems effectively.
contlee
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The coefficient of friction between a surface and a block in .41. Determine the angle needed for a 2kg block to slide down the plane with a constant speed.

Well after drawing a free body diagram I really couldn't see any way to go about solving. So i decided to name what i knew. I know the massc in 2kg or 20N. I know the coefficient of friction is .41. I remember a concept saying tan(angle)= coefficient of friction. But that seems to direct. If you did use the tangent method the angle would be 23. But then why would the information about the weight be included?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi contlee! Welcome to PF! :smile:
contlee said:
… I remember a concept saying tan(angle)= coefficient of friction. But that seems to direct. If you did use the tangent method the angle would be 23.

You'll never remember all those formulas for the exam, so you need to be able to derive them as you go. :wink:

You drew a free-body diagram, so it had weight, normal force, and reaction force.

Now either use components, or draw a vector triangle … and find the normal force first (that's always easiest, because the normal acceleration is always zero! :biggrin:).
But then why would the information about the weight be included?

Sometimes they give you unncecessary information just to test you. :wink:
 
Hi contlee. Technically speaking, your formula is correct. However, if you were to do this problem from scratch, the problem could also be solved by breaking the forces down to their components as tiny-tim suggests. If you solve for the angle in general terms, you'd see that the weight term in the equation would always cancel out, thus giving rise to
co-eff of friction = tan (x)
 
but would the tan method work
 
yes.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top