Flow velocity out of a rectangluar nozzle

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the flow velocity out of a rectangular nozzle, one can relate the volumetric flow rate (300 CFM) to the nozzle's cross-sectional area (4.5" x 0.5"). Assuming uniform flow across the nozzle simplifies the calculation, allowing for a rough estimate of velocity by dividing the flow rate by the area. Compressibility is generally not a concern in this scenario since the duct is open and not under pressure. The length of the hose can be disregarded for this calculation, focusing instead on the nozzle size. For precise applications, accounting for flow variations near the walls may be necessary, but for general purposes, the rough estimate suffices.
Seth_eplmf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm having a hard time coming up with a flow velocity out of a nozzle.

I have a fan that is putting 300 cfm of air through a 3" ID hose. The 3" hose is 45in long, and ends with a rectangular nozzle that has an opening 4.5" x 0.5".

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How would one relate volumetric flow rate with duct flow area and mean air velocity?

Does one have to account for compressibility?
 
The duct is open at the end, so there is not pressure.

Let me ask this: If you have the nozzle at the end of a hose, would you do the calculation assuming the duct is the size of said nozzle and length doesn't matter (not worried about loss)?
 
How accurate do you need your answer to be? If you know the 300CFM is accurate, you could simply take the cross sectional area of the nozzle and assume uniform flow across the nozzle and get a rough answer that way. The real answer will be a bit faster, since the flow at the walls will be slower (so the central flow needs to be faster to maintain the volumetric flow rate), but I wouldn't bother with that unless you need a very precise answer for some reason.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
63K
Back
Top