Why does fluid pressure decrease with higher density in narrow pipes?

AI Thread Summary
Fluid pressure behavior in narrow pipes is influenced by fluid density and velocity. When a fluid transitions from a larger pipe to a smaller one, higher density can lead to lower pressure in the narrower section, contrary to typical expectations. This phenomenon suggests that other variables, such as velocity, are not constant, impacting the pressure readings. Understanding this requires knowledge of fluid dynamics principles, particularly Bernoulli's equation and the Navier-Stokes equations. Further exploration of these concepts can clarify the observed behavior in fluid pressure and flow dynamics.
Lurker_Letum
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I was playing around with Fluid Pressure and Flow over on PHET animations and noticed something odd. When a fluid with high flow rate is going from a large pipe to a small pipe a lower density increases the pressure. And a higher density lowers the pressure in the narrow part of the pipe. My knowledge would say that the higher the density the higher the pressure with other variables constant.

Was wondering if some one could let me know if this is a software issue or could point me in the right direction to read about this a bit more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Lurker, :welcome:

Your intuition is correct:
Lurker_Letum said:
with other variables constant
so just follow it up with the logical conclusion that there must be something else not constant. The velocity, for instance.

Read up on Bernoulli and Navier-Stokes.
 
I'm not really sure what you mean by higher or lower density in this case. Usually when discussing pipe flow like that the density is assumed constant. Do you have a link to what you were viewing?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top