Free fall of straight wire in a homogeneous magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
A straight horizontal wire falling freely in a homogeneous magnetic field generates inductive voltage, which can be calculated using two different approaches. The first method yields E = Blv, where v is the instantaneous velocity, leading to instantaneous EMF. The second method, using E = ΔΦ/Δt, results in E = 1/2Blgt, which accounts for average velocity over time. The difference arises because the first equation considers instantaneous conditions, while the second reflects average conditions due to the wire's acceleration. Both equations are valid but apply to different contexts of EMF calculation.
alkmini
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
hello every body. I have a high school problem
a straight horizontal wire is falling freely in a homogeneous horizontal magnetic field, perpendicular to the wire and i want to find the inductive voltage.
I said E= Blv=Blgt
But I can also say E=ΔΦ/Δt=BΔΑ/Δt=Βl1/2gt [t][2]/Δt=1/2Blgt
why doew this difference of 1/2 arise?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hummm...

Your problem arises because of something like this:v = gt, but... v = 1/2gt too?

That's because on the first equation, you were finding INSTANTANEOUS velocity, so therefore INSTANTANEOUS EMF.
On the second equation, you somehow got average velocity... I'm still trying to figure it out.

A-ha! Okay, I think I got it figured out.
When you substituted 1/2gt for X, and divided by t to get 1/2gt, you actually found the average velocity, since it's NOT instantaneous velocity. The velocity constantly changes because the wire is accelerating.

Both of your equations are right, except the first one is instantaneous EMF after a certain T, and the second equation is average EMF with respect to T.
 
Last edited:
thanks a lot
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top