What Is the Net Flux Through Gaussian Surfaces Near a Charged Rod?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net electric flux through five Gaussian surfaces surrounding a charged rod. The participants agree on using the equation Φ = q/ε0 to determine the flux, where q represents the enclosed charge. It is clarified that surfaces S1, S2, and S3 enclose equal charges, while S4 has a net flux of zero due to the cancellation of charges from S1 and S2. The calculated flux values are Φ for S1 as q/ε0, S2 as -q/ε0, S3 as q/ε0, S4 as 0, and S5 as 2q/ε0. The participants confirm their understanding and calculations throughout the discussion.
musicfairy
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
In the figure below, the charge on a neutral isolated conductor is separated by a nearby positively charged rod. What is the net flux through each of the five Gaussian surfaces shown in cross section? Assume that the charges enclosed by S1, S2, and S3 are equal in magnitude.

24_29.gif


Surface 1:

Surface 2:

Surface 3:

Surface 4:

Surface 5:



I don't know what to do, so I'll need someone(s) to guide me through the process.

I'm guessing I'll have to use the equations

Φ= q/ε0

I really don't know this stuff well, so I can't show much work as of now. That's why I'm trying to find someone who's willing to explain to me a step at a time.

First of all how do I know what sign it is? If it's negative does it mean the sign of q/ε0 is negative? Like S2 would be −q/ε0?

And for S4 would Φ = 0 because it contains S1 and S2 and they have opposite charges?
 

Attachments

  • 24_29.gif
    24_29.gif
    5 KB · Views: 487
Physics news on Phys.org
Figure that the net flux is the sum of the enclosed charge divided by permittivity.

So Φ= q/εo

So yes, S4 is 0 by the problem statement.

The others can be determined simply by using the formula.

I believe that S2 would be ΣΦ2 = -q/εo as stated.
 
I think I get it now.

S1: Φ= q/εo

S2: Φ= −q/εo

S3: Φ= q/εo

S4: Φ= 0

S5: Φ= 2q/εo


Is this correct?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top