Gauss's Law Problem: long, cylindrical charge distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying Gauss's Law to a long cylindrical charge distribution with uniform charge density ρ. For the region where the distance r from the axis is less than the radius R, the electric field is determined to be E = ρr/2ε0. In the region where r exceeds R, the Gaussian surface is a cylinder of radius r, and the total normal outward flux must be calculated, leading to the expression ρr²/2Rε0 for the electric field. The participants clarify the correct application of Gaussian surfaces in both scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law and its mathematical formulation: ∫EdA = Qinside/ε0
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and charge distributions
  • Knowledge of volume charge density and its implications in electrostatics
  • Ability to visualize and construct Gaussian surfaces for different geometries
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields using Gauss's Law for various geometries
  • Explore the implications of charge density variations on electric fields
  • Learn about the application of Gauss's Law in non-uniform charge distributions
  • Investigate the relationship between electric field strength and distance from charged objects
USEFUL FOR

Students of electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields generated by cylindrical charge distributions.

Kaleem
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a long, cylindrical charge distribution of radius R with uniform charge density ρ.

a) Using Gauss’s law, find the electric field at distance r from the axis, where r < R

b) Using Gauss’s law, find the electric field at distance r from the axis, where r > R

Homework Equations


∫EdA = Qinside/ε0
q = ρV
V = πr2L
A = 2πrL

The Attempt at a Solution


I've successfully solved the first part which is E = ρr/2ε0.

However for the second part I am confused as to whether or not I would need to use big R for the area, because we are now going at a distance out of the surface or to use little r.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kaleem said:
I am confused as to whether or not I would need to use big R for the area, because we are now going at a distance out of the surface or to use little r.

i think you are going out to a point r where r >R ,
so your Gaussian surface will be a cylinder of radius r (r>R) enveloping the charged cylinder and you have to calculate the total normal outward flux through this imaginary /constructed Gaussian surface-
 
drvrm said:
i think you are going out to a point r where r >R ,
so your Gaussian surface will be a cylinder of radius r (r>R) enveloping the charged cylinder and you have to calculate the total normal outward flux through this imaginary /constructed Gaussian surface-

What I got from this method so far is ρr2/2Rε0
 
Kaleem said:
What I got from this method so far is ρr2/2Rε0

R is the radius of your cylindrical charge distribtion of volume charge density rho-
so in the gaussian surface you have charges inside which will be = rho x volume of the charged cylinder ;
the flux will be passing through cylindrical surface constructed of radius r
so there will be correction in your result
 
drvrm said:
R is the radius of your cylindrical charge distribtion of volume charge density rho-
so in the gaussian surface you have charges inside which will be = rho x volume of the charged cylinder ;
the flux will be passing through cylindrical surface constructed of radius r
so there will be correction in your result

I see exactly what you mean now, thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K