Heat Equation for Compressible Fluids: Valid or Not?

AI Thread Summary
The heat equation is sometimes valid for compressible fluids like air, particularly when the gas is stagnant, but becomes more complex when the fluid is in motion. The assumption that heat transfer occurs solely through conduction is often inaccurate due to the influence of temperature changes on density, which can create convection currents. This limitation makes the approximation of the heat equation less reliable in dynamic conditions. Using a psychrometric model to set boundary temperatures is a common approach, but it may not fully account for the complexities of heat transfer in moving fluids. Overall, careful consideration of fluid dynamics is essential for accurate modeling in these scenarios.
MattT1991
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am wondering if the heat equation is valid for compressible fluids like air. This is assuming constant 100% humidity.

If it is not then how close is the appoximation.


The model assumes that heat moves through an array of air only by conduction. At the moment I use a psychrometric model to set the boundary Temperaturefor the array from heat flow in, then run the heat equation from that boundary through the array.

Any help asap would be much appreciated,

Thanks,

Matt
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming that by heat equation you mean q = -k \nabla T, then the answer is sometimes. If the gas is stagnant then yes. If it is moving then the equation is much more complicated.
 
MattT1991 said:
The model assumes that heat moves through an array of air only by conduction.

That is a big assumption to make for any fluid, and it's nearly always wrong, because temperature changes cause density changes which cause convection currents.
 
alephzero said:
that is a big assumption to make for any fluid, and it's nearly always wrong, because temperature changes cause density changes which cause convection currents.

qft...
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top