Heat needed to change temperature of hydrogen gas

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the heat needed to change the temperature of 0.650 moles of hydrogen gas from 50 K to 100 K, the equation Q=nC_v(T_f-T_i) is used. The user initially assumed hydrogen is diatomic, using C_v = 5/2 R, but struggled with the calculations. After recalculating with a different approach, the user still arrived at incorrect results. The discussion highlights confusion over using the correct molar mass and specific heat capacity for diatomic versus monatomic hydrogen. Clarification on these values is essential for accurate heat calculation.
Kalie
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
A rigid container holds 0.650 of hydrogen gas. How much heat is needed to change the temperature of the gas from 50 K to 100 K?
All right I know this is easy but for some reason I can't get the right answer what i have been doing is using the equation Q=nC_v(T_f-T_i)
Hydrogen gas is 1 g/mol
so n= .65 mol
C_v= 5/2 R= 20.775
because hydrogen gas is diatomic?
(T_f-T_i)= 100-50= 50
so putting it all together I get 675.188
which is wrong I made Hydrogen monotomic for the hay of it and got 405 J which is wrong too.
Please tell me what I am doing wrong...:cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kalie said:
A rigid container holds 0.650 of hydrogen gas. How much heat is needed to change the temperature of the gas from 50 K to 100 K?
All right I know this is easy but for some reason I can't get the right answer what i have been doing is using the equation Q=nC_v(T_f-T_i)
Hydrogen gas is 1 g/mol
so n= .65 mol
C_v= 5/2 R= 20.775
because hydrogen gas is diatomic?
(T_f-T_i)= 100-50= 50
so putting it all together I get 675.188
which is wrong I made Hydrogen monotomic for the hay of it and got 405 J which is wrong too.
Please tell me what I am doing wrong...:cry:

See the highlights in the quote. A contradiction?
 
OlderDan said:
See the highlights in the quote. A contradiction?
But i also calculated it for monotomic too...
 
Kalie said:
But i also calculated it for monotomic too...

Did you calculate it for diatomic using the correct mass?
 
OlderDan said:
Did you calculate it for diatomic using the correct mass?
Oh!
But When I do that I get
.65/2 = .325
.325*20.775*50 = 337.6 which is still wrong
 
nevermind monatomic at that temp
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top