Help with electric field problem- Yr 12 physics

AI Thread Summary
Protons are accelerated through an electric field from anode to cathode, with initial and final speeds of 6.2 × 10^5 m/s and 8.8 × 10^5 m/s, respectively. The problem requires demonstrating that the electric field strength is 100,000 V/m. The confusion arises from the initial kinetic energy of the protons, which must be accounted for in the energy balance equation. The relationship between electric potential energy and kinetic energy is crucial, as the conservation of energy principle applies: initial kinetic energy plus initial potential energy equals final kinetic energy plus final potential energy. Understanding this balance clarifies how to derive the electric field strength from the given parameters.
JenL
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Protons are accelerated by an electric field passing through a hole in the anode and accelerated towards the cathode (to the right)
A proton passes through the anode at 6.2 × 105 m s–1, and passes through the cathode at 8.8 × 105 m s–1. Show that the strength of the electric field is 100 000 V m–1.

Homework Equations


Ek= 1/2mv^2 and Ep=Eqd

The Attempt at a Solution


Usually we get problems like this when the charged particle is forced to the plate with the same charge thus it gains electric potential. Then the charged particle is released and accelerates towards the plate with the opposite charge so electric potential lost= kinetic energy gained when particle reaches the other plate.
But for this question Ep(lost)=Ek(gained) doesn't seem to apply.
I thought it might be Ep at anode was Ek but I'm kinda confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JenL said:

Homework Statement


Protons are accelerated by an electric field passing through a hole in the anode and accelerated towards the cathode (to the right)
A proton passes through the anode at 6.2 × 105 m s–1, and passes through the cathode at 8.8 × 105 m s–1. Show that the strength of the electric field is 100 000 V m–1.

Homework Equations


Ek= 1/2mv^2 and Ep=Eqd

The Attempt at a Solution


Usually we get problems like this when the charged particle is forced to the plate with the same charge thus it gains electric potential. Then the charged particle is released and accelerates towards the plate with the opposite charge so electric potential lost= kinetic energy gained when particle reaches the other plate.
But for this question Ep(lost)=Ek(gained) doesn't seem to apply.
Why not?

I thought it might be Ep at anode was Ek but I'm kinda confused.
The difference in this problem seems to be that the proton has an initial kinetic energy. Is that what's confusing you?
 
Yes it is the initial kinetic energy that is confusing me.
I tried to work it out but the Ep at the anode was less than the Ek gained at the cathode. I know I need to take into consider the initial Ek but I don't understand how it would work.
 
Anodes are positive and cathodes are negative. So the particles travel from high VA to lower VC, losing potential anergy and gaining (kinetic) energy to the tune of q##\Delta##V = q(VA - VB). Both factors are positive.

A simple energy balance suffices to extract VA - VB
 
JenL said:
Yes it is the initial kinetic energy that is confusing me.
I tried to work it out but the Ep at the anode was less than the Ek gained at the cathode. I know I need to take into consider the initial Ek but I don't understand how it would work.
It's just conservation of energy: ##K_i + U_i = K_f + U_f##, where ##U## is the electric potential energy (not electric potential).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top