What does the value for 'c' represent in Hooke's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamBevan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
AI Thread Summary
In the context of Hooke's Law, the value for 'c' in the equation y=mx+c should theoretically be close to zero, as it represents measurement errors rather than a significant force. If a non-zero value is obtained, it indicates potential inaccuracies in the experiment. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using proper methods, such as linear regression, to analyze data accurately. Additionally, clarification on the definition of 'x' in the experiment is crucial for correct interpretation of results. Overall, the focus is on ensuring that 'c' reflects minimal deviation from zero in a well-conducted experiment.
iamBevan
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi guys - we did an experiment at college putting some weights on a spring for our Hooke's Law module. When I graph it I get a value for c, in the equation y=mx+c. Is this correct? Will c have a value?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well Hooke's law says that F is proportional to x. So if you get a value for c, then it should be small.
 
It is pretty small - I remember hearing that c would be the force required to hold the spring tight, wasn't sure if that was true or not...
 
iamBevan said:
When I graph it I get a value for c, in the equation y=mx+c. Is this correct? Will c have a value?
Hooke's Law states that F_{spring} = -kx, where k is the spring constant and x is the displacement vector.

Theoretically, you should get a value for c. However, this value is 0. If you are getting anything that deviates too greatly from 0, it is probably an error.

What method are you using to find the line? Are you using linear regression?
 
y2-y1/x2-x1
 
iamBevan said:
y2-y1/x2-x1
So...\frac{Δy}{Δx}? How many trials did you do? I would imagine that using \frac{Δy}{Δx} with more than 2 points would get...weird.

Try making a least-squares regression line.

The equation will follow the model of \hat{y} = a + bx, where b = r \cdot \frac{S_{y}}{S_{x}} and a = \bar{y} - b\bar{x}.

For help...
S_{x} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{n-1}\sum{(x_{i} - \bar{x})}^{2}}, where n is the number of trials you did and xi is the value of x for trial #i. Follow the same process for Sy, except replace the x's with y's.

r = \frac{1}{n-1}\sum{(\frac{x_{i} - \bar{x}}{S_{x}})}(\frac{y_{i} - \bar{y}}{S_{y}}).

Don't worry if this looks complicated. It really isn't. Additionally, you might get a better looking (and possibly more accurate) line.

Out of curiosity, how did you use \frac{Δy}{Δx} to do this, if you did more than two trials?
 
iamBevan said:
Hi guys - we did an experiment at college putting some weights on a spring for our Hooke's Law module. When I graph it I get a value for c, in the equation y=mx+c. Is this correct? Will c have a value?

Thanks.

In your experiment, what is the definition of x? Does x represent the amount that the length of the spring increases (relative to having no force on the spring), or is it the distance from some arbitrary spatial reference point to the end of the spring where the force is applied?
 
iamBevan said:
It is pretty small - I remember hearing that c would be the force required to hold the spring tight, wasn't sure if that was true or not...

Your value for 'c' should be close to zero as this would represent errors in measurement and so on. So you will not have to figure what qualitatively 'c' represents.
 
Back
Top