How Accurate is My Solution for IC and VCE in a Silicon Transistor Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter martyg314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Transistor
martyg314
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is for a 300 level electronics lab class and I'm wondering if I'm close:

Homework Statement



If the following silicon transistor (VBE = 0.6 V) has a B value of 100, determine IC and VCE.

Homework Equations



http://img862.imageshack.us/img862/80/circuit1.th.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

The Attempt at a Solution



First I found an expression for \alpha (0.99) and noted that
VBC=VCE-0.6

Then I used Kirchoff's laws for the BE loop and the "loop" from the -15 V down to ground:

BE Loop:
-15 + 2000IC + VCE + 1000IE = 0
-15 + 2990IC + VCE = 0

15 V to Ground:
-15 + 40000IB +VBC + 2000IC = 0
-15.6 + 2400IC + VCE =0

I then solved these equations to get:
IC = 1 mA
VCE = 18.04 V

Any tips would be greatly appreciated.

Also, if anyone can recommend a good electronics text. Mine (Principles of Electronic Instrumentation by Diefenderfer) is filled with errors and is short on example problems.

Thanks,

MG

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It might be profitable to replace the base bias network with a Thevenin equivalent. Then the only loop you need to concentrate on will be the one containing the base-emitter.

Emitter current should be IE = IB(β + 1). Then, knowing VBE = -0.6V, you should have everything required to solve for IB, thence IC.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top