How Are the Components of Angular Momentum Derived Mathematically?

jg370
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In my study of Quantum Mechanics, I am using Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David J. Griffiths. So far I have done quite well. However, as I come to the section on Angular Momentum, I need help to get further.

Homework Equations


Classically, the angular momentum of a particle is given by:

\mathbf{L = r\times p }

This is all good. But this is followed by component form of the above equation as:

L_x = yp_z-zp_y, L_y = zp_x-xp_z, L_z = xp_y-yp_z

I am curious how L_x, L_y , L_x are mathematically derived

The Attempt at a Solution



I have look at other textbooks and various posting on internet but I have not been able to find anything to help me with. Hopefully, someone will suggest some thing.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let \mathbf r = x\hat x + y\hat y + z \hat z and [ltex]\mathbf p = p_x \hat x + p_y \hat y + p_z \hat z[/itex]. What ls \mathbf L = \mathbf r \times \mathbf p?
 
By the way, that definition is just part of classical mechanics. It's not unique to quantum mechanics.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top