How can the electric potential of a dust grain in Saturn's rings be determined?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the electric potential of a dust grain in Saturn's rings, one must calculate the number of electrons needed to achieve a surface potential of -400V. The relevant equations include V = U/q and V = -W/q, where V is the electric potential, U is the potential energy, and q is the charge. The challenge lies in finding U, as the problem does not provide direct information on it. The discussion highlights the need for understanding the relationship between electric potential and charge, particularly for a spherical conductor. Ultimately, solving this problem requires applying fundamental concepts of electric potential and charge distribution.
Malgrif
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Much of the material making up Saturn's rings is in the form of tiny dust grains having radii on the order of 10^-6 these grains are located in a region containing a dilute ionized gas, and they pick up excess electrons. As an approximation suppose each grain is sphereical, with radius R=1.0*10^-6m. How many electrons would one grain have to pick up to have a potential of -400V on its surface. (taking V=0 at infinity)?


Homework Equations


V=U/q
V=-W/q


The Attempt at a Solution


not quite sure where to start. I think V=-400=U/q but I don't know how to get U. I'd like to understand why U is relevant in this question also. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the electric potential of a conducting sphere of radius r and charge Q ?
 
SammyS said:
What is the electric potential of a conducting sphere of radius r and charge Q ?

oh alright. is there another way to solve that problem without relying on that though. That equation is presented in a later section and the question is presented with only knowledge of potential energy and electric potential assumed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top