How did my professor get this integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter grandpa2390
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Professor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the Maxwell distribution function for one-dimensional and two-dimensional classical gases, specifically focusing on the normalization of the distribution function and the evaluation of a Gaussian integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the normalization constant K and its relation to the Gaussian integral. Some suggest using the definition of the Gaussian error function, while others reference online resources for the integral's evaluation. There are questions about the correctness of derived expressions for K in both dimensions and the implications of the Gaussian form.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their reasoning and questioning assumptions about the Gaussian integral. Some have provided guidance on the form of the Gaussian and its implications for the distribution, while others are verifying their results against established forms.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the notation and the correct formulation of the integrals in both one and two dimensions. Participants are also considering the implications of the equipartition theorem in their discussions.

grandpa2390
Messages
473
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


derive maxwell distribution function in case of 1-d and 2-d classical gas

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The constant K can be solved from normalization.
##\int_{-∞}^{∞} F(V_x)dV_x = 1##

substituting ##F(V_x)=Ke^{+/- kV_x^2}##

##1 = K\int_{-∞}^{∞} e^{-kV_x^2}dV_x##
which equals:
##K(\frac{π}{k})^{1/2}##

how did that integral become that result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect that he used the definition of the Gauss error function and its limiting values at +/- ∞. At least, that's what I would do :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: grandpa2390
This is the integral of a Gaussian (a bell curve essentially). There are plenty of resources online that give you the general form of this integral. One such resource is http://www.umich.edu/~chem461/Gaussian Integrals.pdf. They also include a very handy derivation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: grandpa2390
Daniel Gallimore said:
This is the integral of a Gaussian (a bell curve essentially). There are plenty of resources online that give you the general form of this integral. One such resource is http://www.umich.edu/~chem461/Gaussian Integrals.pdf. They also include a very handy derivation.

I followed that. And it assuming I did it correctly... I got the same result.
##K = \frac{k}{π}^\frac{1}{2}## in 1-D
and
##K^2 = \frac{k}{π}## which is the same thing for 2-D

is that right?
 
Last edited:
grandpa2390 said:
I followed that. And it assuming I did it correctly... I got the same result.
##K = \frac{k}{π}^\frac{1}{2}## in 1-D
and
##K^2 = \frac{k}{π}## which is the same thing for 2-D

is that right?

For 1D, make sure to put some parenthesis around you fraction so we can tell you're setting the whole fraction the the 1/2 power.

For 2D, I believe your formula generalizes to [tex]1 = K\int_{-∞}^{∞}\int_{-∞}^{∞} e^{-k(V_x^2+V_y^2)}dV_x \, dV_y[/tex]
 
Daniel Gallimore said:
For 1D, make sure to put some parenthesis around you fraction so we can tell you're setting the whole fraction the the 1/2 power.

For 2D, I believe your formula generalizes to [tex]1 = K\int_{-∞}^{∞}\int_{-∞}^{∞} e^{-k(V_x^2+V_y^2)}dV_x \, dV_y[/tex]

well I thought it was ##F(V_x)F(V_y) = Ke^{(..)}Ke^{(...)}## and so K^2
 
grandpa2390 said:
well I thought it was ##F(V_x)F(V_y) = Ke^{(..)}Ke^{(...)}## and so K^2

A one-dimensional Gaussian has the form [tex]F(x)=Ke^{-\alpha x^2}[/tex] A two-dimensional Gaussian has the form [tex]F(x,y)=Ke^{-\alpha (x^2+y^2)}[/tex] For an ideal gas in two dimensions, the Maxwell velocity distribution is a two-dimensional Gaussian (I'm assuming [itex]V_i[/itex] represents the speed in the [itex]i[/itex]th direction). This is a consequence of the equipartition theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: grandpa2390

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K