How Do Parallel Current-Carrying Wires Affect Each Other?

AI Thread Summary
Three parallel wires arranged in an equilateral triangle, each carrying a current of 50 A in the same direction, exert attractive forces on each other. The force between any two wires can be calculated using the formula F = 2*10^-7(I1)(I2)/d, resulting in a force of 5.0*10^-3 N for each pair. To find the resultant force on one wire, the parallelogram rule can be applied, leading to a resultant force of (3^1/2)(5*10^-3) N directed downward. The direction of this resultant force can be indicated on a diagram for clarity. The calculations and conventions discussed are consistent with the principles of electromagnetism.
steve12
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


hi,im a bit confused by the following question.i think i have a fairly good idea of most of the solution but the actual wording of the question is stil throwing me.

Q: 3 parallel wires,arranged in the form of an equilateral triangle,of side length 10cm,each carry a current of 50 A in the same direction.Calculate the force on anyone wire due to the other two.


Homework Equations


I used the equation F= 2*10^-7(I1)(I2)/d
a
and arranged wires as follows: *


b* c*

with wires going into page.

The Attempt at a Solution


i calculated the force on the top wire,a, due to b and c:
F=2*10^-7(50)(50)/0.1 = 5.0*10^-3 N in each case,along the line joining a to b and a to c

so this force F is attractive as the currents are in the same direction,yes?
what i am wondering is if i have to calculate the resultant force on a,that is,use for eg the parallelogram rule to find the resultant force, which would point in the direction straight down,or can i simply leave the ans. as is??

is there some sort of convention for expressing this direction or can i just say in the direction indicated on a diagram?

i used the cosine rule and found that the resultant force is (3^1/2)(5*10^-3)N in the direction pointing straight down so that the vector would bisect bc as shown in diagram,does this make sense?
thanks steve:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok that didnt work out,wires are meant to look like this:

...a*


b* .... c*



ignore dots
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top