How Do Quantum Numbers Relate to Electron Configurations?

AI Thread Summary
Quantum numbers are essential for understanding electron configurations, with each number representing specific properties of electrons in an atom. The principal quantum number (n) indicates energy levels, while the azimuthal quantum number (l) defines sublevels, and the magnetic quantum number (ml) specifies orbitals. The spin quantum number (ms) denotes the electron's spin direction. Each quantum number has restrictions on the number of electrons it can accommodate, such as n=1, l=0, ml=0 allowing for two electrons, and n=5, l=3, ml=+2 allowing for a maximum of 14 electrons. Understanding these relationships is crucial for mastering electron configurations and preparing for exams.
Bradracer18
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, this isn't really homework but will help me on the exam and the homework too. We are working in the book, where you just get to electron structure, orbitals, configurations, etc.


The part that I need help with is Quantum Numbers. My book has:
n(principal energy levels)
l(sublevels)
ml(Orbitals)
ms(Electron Spin)

I don't really understand this part, the book explains it very poorly. I understand Electron configuration(1s2s,2p,etc). If someone could help me relate this information, I'd be very grateful. I'm not sure how it all ties together.

Here is an example question(homework) that I don't understand completely.

How many electrons in an atom can have each of the following quantum number designations?
a. n=1, l=0, ml=0
b. n = 5, l=3, ml=+2
c. n=3, l=2

Thank you,
Brad
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone know this stuff, I know its basic...but any help would be great!
 
Much better explanation, thank you Geoffjb...I appreciate it!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top