How Do You Calculate Speed at the Bottom of a Hill Considering Friction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lonlyincolleg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill Speed
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the speed at the bottom of a hill considering friction, apply the conservation of mechanical energy principle, which states that the initial kinetic energy plus potential energy minus work done by friction equals the final kinetic energy. The bike's mass is 40 kg, its initial speed is 5.0 m/s, and the hill height is 10 m with a friction force of 20 N. The work done by friction must be calculated using the distance traveled, which is 100 m. The correct approach involves determining the total energy at the top of the hill and equating it to the total energy at the bottom, factoring in the work done against friction. This method will yield the final speed, which is calculated to be 11 m/s.
lonlyincolleg
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Speed at the bottom of a hill - Please help!

Homework Statement


Bike (mass 40kg) traveling down a hill. Speed at the top of the hill is 5.0 m/s. The hill is 10m high and 100m long. Force of friction is 20N, what is the speed at the bottom?


Homework Equations


The only formula I've tried is v(final) = Sq. rt. of 2gy(initial). I don't know what y is, where friction plays into this and obviously I'm not getting the answer. Please help!


The Attempt at a Solution


I have converted the units to kg, and m, and drawn a picture. I know that the answer is 11 m/s but there isn't a formula or very similar problem in my book. (The only similar problem doesn't account for friction so I don't really know where to begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


lonlyincolleg said:

Homework Statement


Bike (mass 40kg) traveling down a hill. Speed at the top of the hill is 5.0 m/s. The hill is 10m high and 100m long. Force of friction is 20N, what is the speed at the bottom?


Homework Equations


The only formula I've tried is v(final) = Sq. rt. of 2gy(initial). I don't know what y is, where friction plays into this and obviously I'm not getting the answer. Please help!


The Attempt at a Solution


I have converted the units to kg, and m, and drawn a picture. I know that the answer is 11 m/s but there isn't a formula or very similar problem in my book. (The only similar problem doesn't account for friction so I don't really know where to begin.

Conservation of mechanical energy:

K_i+U_i-\vec{W}=K_f+U_f.
 


asleight said:
Conservation of mechanical energy:

K_i+U_i-\vec{W}=K_f+U_f.

W should be positive, not negative, and it's the work done by friction.
 


You will have to know the distance traveled by the bike to know the amount of work done by friction. Find that out from your picture. After that use that energy is conservated as suggested. Be wary of how you define your friction. Look at the dimensions of your terms, they should always correspond. The total energy before (at the top of the hill) should equal the total energy after (including the work done by friction during the ride).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top