How Do You Calculate the Radius of Planet Oceania?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnmakrets
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Trig
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the radius of planet Oceania, the astronaut's observations lead to the use of trigonometric relationships involving right triangles. The key equations involve the Pythagorean theorem and the sine law, where the distance to the horizon and the radius of the planet are related through the angles observed. A diagram illustrating the relationships between the astronaut's position, the horizon, and the planet's center is essential for clarity. The angle at the horizon can be used to derive the radius using the cosine function. Proper diagram formats are recommended for effective communication of the solution.
mnmakrets
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
An astronaut arrives on the planet Oceania and climbs to the top of a cliff overlooking the sea. The astronaut’s eye is 100 m above the sea level and he observes that the horizon in all directions appears to be at angle of 5 mrad below the local horizontal.

What is the radius of the planet Oceania at sea level?

How far away is the horizon from the astronaut?

[Hint: the line of sight from the astronaut to the horizon is tangential to surface of the planet at sea level.]


Having drawn out the problem I have two equations:
Pythagoras: x^2 + R^2 = (R+100)^2
Sine Law: x= (R+100)sinA

x is the distance between the horizon and the astronaut
R is the radius of the planet
A is the angle between the two lengths of radius of the planet (sorry might sound a bit confusing, it makes more sense if you draw it out!)

I then tried to combine them and solve for the radius of the planet R but I am not having any luck getting the right answer :(

Any steps, answer, and/or hints are all greatly appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;

It helps to be careful about what you call things...

You should have drawn a triangle OAB.
O is at the center of the planet.
A is where the astronaut is standing,
B is on the surface of Oceania at sea level.

Angles:
The angle OBA is ##\frac{\pi}{2}## (working in radians).
The angle AOB is ##\alpha##
The angle OAB is ##\frac{\pi}{2}-\alpha##

Lengths of the sides:
##|OB|=R## (radius of Oceania at sea level)
##|OA|=R+a## (a=100m) it is best to keep variables.
##|AB|=x = R\tan\alpha##

You will also need another triangle: ABC
points A and B are as before.
point C is on the same line as OB, further out from Oceania.
The line AC is perpendicular to the line OA.
The angle CAB is given to you - from the drawing you should be able to see how it is related to ##\alpha##.

You now have three right-angled triangles.
... but I'm afraid you'll probably have to attach a diagram.
 
Thank you, I followed the steps you have given me and I drew the first triangle, however I am having trouble understanding where the line AC should go, I made the AC line red in the diagram, I am not sure if I drew it correctly. I attached the diagram which I drew in a word doc., I don't know any other way of drawing diagrams online, I hope its not an inconvenience.
 

Attachments

The line AC is supposed to be the local horizontal to A (the Astronaut).
The line AB is the line to the horizon as seen from A.
I attached the diagram which I drew in a word doc., I don't know any other way of drawing diagrams online, I hope its not an inconvenience.
It is poor netiquette to post attachments in poorly documented formats like docx - or any MS Office format.
Not everyone can read them.

For diagrams, please use png or gif format.
For photographs: jpg is usually good enough.
For general documents, please use an open document format or pdf

The attachment function of PF let's you upload from your computer - another approach is to use a service like google-docs.
 
Last edited:
From your figure, R/(R+a) = cosα. You know α, so you can calculate R.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top