How Do You Calculate the Spring Constant for a Car's Shock Absorbers?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the spring constant for a car's shock absorbers, the period of oscillation (1.81 s) and the mass of the car (1380 kg) are used. The correct formula involves the relationship w^2 = 4k/m, where k is the spring constant. A common mistake is not accounting for the four springs in parallel, which effectively multiplies the spring constant by four. After correcting the frequency calculation by multiplying 2π by the period, the correct value for k can be determined. The final answer reflects the proper understanding of the system's dynamics.
Bearbull24.5
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car with bad shock absorbers bounces up and down with a period of 1.81 s after hitting a bump. The car has a mass of 1380 kg and is supported by four springs of equal force constant k. Determine a value for k.
Answer in units of N/m.


Homework Equations


T=2pi/w
T=1.81 s

w^2=k/m

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for w in the above equation and got 11.372 as my answer. I then plugged it into the second equation and solved for k. I got an answer of 178,482.6366 which I immediately plugged in and got wrong. I then divided it by 4 thinking that would work. Nope got it wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did the same thing. I rearranged the equation and got k = (2pi/T)2 * m. And I got 101806.5992 for mine, and got it wrong. ?? Someone please help. Thanks. ;)
 
Bearbull24.5, I believe you solved for the frequency incorrectly (when you solved for w as a function of T, did you end up multiplying 2pi by T or dividing 2pi by T; which should you have done)?

And further, while you were supposed to divide by 4, you should have an understanding of why that is the case. The car is supported by 4 equal springs with spring constant k - these springs are in parallel, meaning that for a given force (the weight of the car), all 4 springs will move down the same amount. If you're looking at the natural frequency of this system, the total spring constant is 4*k. So w^2=4k/m. The rest of the problem is algebra and arithmetic.

MissPenguins, you've made an arithmetic error and forgotten about the factor of 4 described above.
 
jamesrc said:
Bearbull24.5, I believe you solved for the frequency incorrectly (when you solved for w as a function of T, did you end up multiplying 2pi by T or dividing 2pi by T; which should you have done)?

And further, while you were supposed to divide by 4, you should have an understanding of why that is the case. The car is supported by 4 equal springs with spring constant k - these springs are in parallel, meaning that for a given force (the weight of the car), all 4 springs will move down the same amount. If you're looking at the natural frequency of this system, the total spring constant is 4*k. So w^2=4k/m. The rest of the problem is algebra and arithmetic.

MissPenguins, you've made an arithmetic error and forgotten about the factor of 4 described above.

Alright, I figured it out and got the right answer. Thanks. ;)
 
I multiplied 2pi by T
 
Got it
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top