How Do You Correctly Calculate the Electric Field Under a Thundercloud?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field under a thundercloud modeled as a vertical dipole, the configuration includes a +40C charge at 10km and a -40C charge at 6km. The electric field at the ground is derived from the contributions of both charges, but the initial calculation yields incorrect results. The correct formula for the electric field should include proper parentheses to ensure π and ε0 are in the denominator. The expected electric field strength is 12.8 kV/m directed upwards. Accurate attention to signs and magnitudes in the calculation is crucial for obtaining the correct result.
nathangrand
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
The electrical system of typical thundercloud can be represented by a vertical dipole consisting of a charge of +40C at a height of 10km and a charge of -40C vertically below it at a height of 6km. What is the electric field at the ground directly beneath the thundercloud.

I am simply adding the the field from each point charge at the ground together but get the wrong answer...any suggestions?

Eground= 40/4*∏*ε0(1/10000^2 - 1/6000^2)

Answer should be 12.8KV/m upwards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the point on the ground, where you are calculating the E field:
What is the direction of the E field due to a positive charge which is above?

What is the direction of the E field due to a negative charge which is above?
 
+ve into ground, -ve charge field up?
 
Yes. Now look at the signs you have in your calculation.
 
A sign error isn't my problem - it's the magnitude I get wrong...
 
nathangrand said:
Eground= 40/4*∏*ε0(1/10000^2 - 1/6000^2)

Place proper parentheses so the π and ε0 are in the denominator.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top