acspin said:
Wow, I made such stupid mistakes. I'm studying for my final and I'm really dusty on this subject.
So, the Normal force is equal to the perpendicular component of the weight vector, thus:
N = mg cos \beta
The normal force is always perpendicular to the
surface (meaning it's also perpendicular to the frictional force too). But yes, you're equation looks good!
And by the way, I wouldn't call them "
stupid" mistakes, just mistakes. Everybody makes mistakes. I make mistakes all the time. Everybody does. http://www.websmileys.com/sm/crazy/146.gif
Since objects don't accelerate perpendicular to the incline, then I only need to consider friction for Net Force calculations and not for calculating N, correct?
Yes that right! In a case where an object is sliding down a constant-angle incline, its acceleration is perpendicular to the Normal of the incline, so its acceleration has no affect on the normal force (this, of course, is assuming that the incline
itself is not accelerating, which is a whole different story.) So yes. (Of course there might be a
component of the gravitational force vector that fits into the equation of the net force, along with the frictional force vector. But not the normal force vector itself.)
Just keep in mind that the
magnitude of the frictional force is a function of the normal force, so they are related. But when summing the vectors to determine the net force of an accelerating body on a (non-accelerating, constant-angle) incline, the normal force vector
itself is not a part of it.
(Of course this particular problem deals with
static friction, implying that nothing is moving at all. But in general, you're right.)
Thank you so much for your help!
If I were to express the static frictional force in terms of Mg, would it be ok if i did this:
F = mus (mg cos <br />
\beta<br />)
Looks good to me.
