How Does a 10% Reduction in Sun's Power Affect Earth's Temperature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aforce20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balance Radiation
AI Thread Summary
A 10% reduction in the Sun's power would significantly affect Earth's temperature, calculated using the Stefan-Boltzmann law and considering an albedo of 0.3. The total energy absorbed by Earth is determined by the solar constant of 1.35 kW/m², adjusted for reflectivity. The equilibrium condition requires that the power absorbed equals the power radiated, leading to a derived temperature of approximately 254 K. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in the equations used to solve the problem, as participants seek assistance in understanding the calculations. Understanding the relationship between absorbed and radiated power is crucial for solving the temperature change due to solar power reduction.
aforce20
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. If the Sun’s power is reduced by 10%, what would the temperature of the Earth be? Assume an albedo of 0.3 and do not consider greenhouse effects.


Homework Equations



There is an equation here in the book but it makes no sense to me

The Attempt at a Solution



Without the understanding of the equation, I have no attempt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aforce20 said:
There is an equation here in the book but it makes no sense to me

Without the understanding of the equation, I have no attempt

Hi aforce20! :smile:

What equation?
 
Here is the example from the book that we are supposed to go off of
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The total energy absorbed for a solar constant, or available power per unit area at Earth's orbit, of 1.35 kW/m2 is, assuming an albedo (reflectivity) of 30%

Pabsorbed = (1 -0.3)( 1.35 kW/m2) ([PLAIN][PLAIN]http://www.kartones.net/images_posts/pi_symbol.png RE2)

A body at absolute temperature T radiates according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law as

Pradiated = ( 5.67 x 10-8 W/m2 K4) T4 (4[PLAIN][PLAIN]http://www.kartones.net/images_posts/pi_symbol.png RE2)

where Earths total spherical surgace area is 4[PLAIN][PLAIN]http://www.kartones.net/images_posts/pi_symbol.png RE2 . Thus, since in the long term the power absorbed must again be radiated for Earth to be in equilibrium, Pradiated = Pabsorbed , and [PLAIN][PLAIN]http://www.kartones.net/images_posts/pi_symbol.png RE2 is a common factor , so( 1 - 0.3 ) ( 1.35 kW/m2) = 4(5.67 x 10-8 W/m2k4) T4

Therefore,

T4 = ( 0.7) (1350 W/m2)/4(5.67 x 10-8 W/m2 K4) = 4.17 x 109 K4

or

T=254 K

BTW I could not find the pi symbol so I used one from google, that is why it is so huge. Also, this class is for non-science majors so try not go get to technical here.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
aforce20 said:
The total energy absorbed for a solar constant, or available power per unit area at Earth's orbit, of 1.35 kW/m2 is, assuming an albedo (reflectivity) of 30%

Pabsorbed = (1 -0.3)( 1.35 kW/m2) (π RE2)

A body at absolute temperature T radiates according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law as

Pradiated = ( 5.67 x 10-8 W/m2 K4) T4 (4π RE2)

where Earths total spherical surgace area is 4π RE2 . Thus, since in the long term the power absorbed must again be radiated for Earth to be in equilibrium, Pradiated = Pabsorbed , and π RE2 is a common factor , so

( 1 - 0.3 ) ( 1.35 kW/m2) = 4(5.67 x 10-8 W/m2k4) T4

Therefore,

T4 = ( 0.7) (1350 W/m2)/4(5.67 x 10-8 W/m2 K4) = 4.17 x 109 K4

or T=254 K

Hi aforce20! :smile:

(have a pi: π :wink:)

The basic equation simply says that the power out must equal the power in.

Which line do you not understand?
 
I just don't know where to start in solving the problem :frown:
 
Someone please help me through this ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top