How Does a Cantilever Beam Impact Structural Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the confusion surrounding cantilever beams in structural calculations. Participants clarify that the presence of a cantilever beam does not fundamentally alter the approach to static equilibrium equations, as it can be treated similarly to simply supported beams. The main concern is how the cantilever affects reactions at supports, but it is emphasized that the calculations remain consistent. A hint is provided regarding shear forces, indicating they remain zero at both ends of the beam. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of correctly accounting for all forces in the calculations.
xperty
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

2l8gjmr.png

Homework Equations



I am totally confused about this question because of the Cantilever beam. I am usally ok with these questions but the addition of the Cantilever beam has thrown me off.

The Attempt at a Solution



Only been attemped without Cantilever beam.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For which part are you confused? Go about it like you would for a simply supported beam. It doesn't matter that the roller support isn't on the end.
 
I am confused to whether the Cantilever beam effects the reactions at each support and where it will make a difference in this question.
 
The fact that it's a cantilever doesn't affect anything, really. It just means that the support isn't on the end. You still go about your static equilibrium equations the same way and work from there. If it helps, just think of it as an unknown force. Were this a fixed support (with only one fixed support), then that would change things a little. But this problem works just like a regular, simply-supported beam.

Also, just a little hint for part B - you'll still have the shear force as 0 at both ends of the beam.
 
Ok thanks.
 
o6haa0.jpg


This is my attempt at finding the reactions at each support. I would appreciate it if you could tell me if i have went wrong.
 
xperty: You are doing fairly well, but you currently omitted one applied load in your summation(Fv). You also omitted two forces in your summation(Ma). Try again. Also, please do not post wide images directly to the forum page. Just post a text link to wide images.
 
xperty: Excellent work. Your answer in post 8 is correct.
 
  • #10
Thank you :D
 
Back
Top