How Does a Climber Use Friction to Stay Stationary?

AI Thread Summary
A climber weighing 75 kg uses friction from his shoes and back against vertical walls to remain stationary in a chimney. The static coefficients of friction are 0.8 for the shoes and 0.6 for the back, with the lower coefficient being crucial for maintaining position. To stay in place, the frictional force must equal the gravitational force acting downward. The climber's calculations indicate confusion regarding the normal force required, as he initially believes the friction from his back is sufficient alone. Ultimately, the problem requires considering both friction forces to determine the minimum normal force needed for stability.
WoArt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 75kg climber is supported in a "chimney" by the friction forces exerted on his shoes and back. The static coefficients of friction between his shoes and the wall, and between his back and the wall, are .8 and .6, respectively. what is the minimum normal force he must exert? Assume the walls are verticle and that friction forces are both a maximum.


Homework Equations



F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution



This one confuses me. If the climber is to stay in place, its the lower static friction coefficient that matters, isn't it? That being the case, in order to stay in place acceleration must be zero so Ff + Fmg = 0? Working that out though gives .6Fn + 75*9.8 = 0, which comes out to 735, which seems too high.

I have to assume I am completely missing something, can someone point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in order for the climber to stay in place, the frictional force must at least be equal to the force due to gravity. If you write out all the forces (best way to start EVERY problem), you will see that F_g is aimed down, F_f is aimed upward, So, using F_f=F_g and solving for N gives the minimum normal force needed.

remember that since the climbers shoes and back are touching in different places there is more than one F_f to consider
 
Yea, that's what I thought I was doing with f_f+f_mg=0. F_f being a function of F_n * .6 (friction coefficient). F_n is equal and opposite the force of the climber's push, right? Doesn't that give you .6Fn + 75kg *9.8 = 0?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top