How Is Overlap Length x Determined for No Rotational Motion After Collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the overlap length x for two identical sticks after a collision, ensuring the resulting system has translational but no rotational motion. The initial stick, spinning with angular frequency ω, collides inelastically with a stationary stick after its pivot is removed. Conservation of linear momentum indicates that the final momentum of the combined sticks must equal the initial momentum of the moving stick. For angular momentum, using the center of overlap simplifies calculations, leading to the conclusion that x should be 2/3 of the stick's length l. The approach confirms that conservation of linear momentum may not be necessary if initial conditions are properly applied.
conana
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



On a frictionless horizontal table, a stick of mass m and length l spins around a pivot at one of its ends with angular frequency \omega. It collides and sticks to an identical stick (which is presumably stationary), with an overlap length equal to x. Immediately before the collision, the pivot is removed. What should x be so that after the collision the double-stick system has translational but no rotational motion?

The Attempt at a Solution



From the diagram provided, it appears that the collision is inelastic so I am pretty sure I can not use conservation of energy. I guess my approach would be to use conservation of angular momentum and possibly linear momentum as well. I am pretty lost as to how to get started. I tried writing out an expression for my angular momentum but I am not sure what to use as my origin and how to find the angular momentum after the collision.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do the sticks stick together? (All puns intended.) I'll assume they do, because I don't think the problem is solvable otherwise.

You're right that you need both the conservation of linear momentum and the conservation of angular momentum. Since the sticks must move in the same direction, you know that their final momentum, 2mv, must be equal to the initial momentum of the moving stick.

For angular momentum, you can use any origin you want. I'd pick the middle of the overlap of the 2 sticks because that simplifies calculations quite a bit--final angular momentum ends up being 0 being the two-rod combination's center of mass moves directly away from the origin. Initial angular momentum is pretty easy to calculate.
 
For linear momentum I get

p_i=p_f

\Rightarrow mv_i=2mv_f.

\Rightarrow \dfrac{1}{2}ml\omega=2mv_f

\Rightarrow v_f=\dfrac{1}{4}l\omega.

Then for the angular momentum, using the middle of the overlap of the two sticks as my origin, I get

L_i=L_f

\Rightarrow mv_ir-I\omega=0

(Initially I typed this out as a sum of two Ls instead of a difference which gave me a nonsensical answer x>l. I now believe it to be a difference because the CM of the stick is rotating in one direction about the origin while the stick is rotating in the opposite direction about its center of mass. Is this logic correct?)

where the distance from the origin to the CM of the rotating stick r=\dfrac{l-x}{2} and the moment of inertia of the stick about its CM I=\dfrac{1}{12}ml^2. Then

ml\omega\dfrac{l-x}{4}-\dfrac{1}{12}ml^2\omega=0

\Rightarrow x=\dfrac{2}{3}l.

Is this looking to be on the right track? Also, (assuming this is correct) it appears as though I didn't end up needing to use conservation of linear momentum, just my initial linear momentum. Thank you so much for your help.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top