How Much of a Bicycle's Kinetic Energy is in Its Wheels?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jjf5122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the proportion of a bicycle's kinetic energy that is attributed to its wheels, with a given answer of 36%. The participant is struggling with the correct application of formulas for both translational and rotational kinetic energy. They express confusion about whether to double the rotational energy or inertia in their calculations. Another contributor suggests that the wheels carry energy in both translational and rotational forms, implying that the total kinetic energy calculation should include both components. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in accurately determining the distribution of kinetic energy in a bicycle's wheels.
jjf5122
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bicycle weighs 23lbf, including hollow wheels each weighing 2.5lbf. Calculate how much of the bike's kinetic energy is in the wheels. Ans = 36%

Homework Equations


1. I = mr^2 <----- i think this is 2mr^2 because of two wheels
2. Kinetic Energy = 1/2mv^2 <---- translational of the bike
3. Ke = I(omega)^2 <------ rotational of the wheels
4. Ktotal = 1/2mv^2 + Iw^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried putting the rotational kinetic energy over the total kinetic then multiplying by 100 but it isn't working... Also I am not sure if I am supposed to double the rotational energy or not. I think that I am only supposed to double the inertia. Either way i can't seem to arrive at the given solution. Am i doing something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wheels carry energy in two ways as you suggest. I would think then it would be 2*(1/2mv^2+Mr^2)/ (the translational kinetic energy plus the rotational of the whole bike)--perhaps you neglected the latter term in your calculation?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top