How to Calculate the Electric Charge of a Capacitor with Mixed Dielectrics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric charge of a capacitor with mixed dielectrics, given specific parameters such as voltage, distance, and dielectric constants. The user successfully applies Gauss's Law to derive an expression for charge but encounters difficulties due to the lack of information regarding the areas of the dielectrics (S1 and S2). Participants suggest that the problem may either lack sufficient data for a numerical solution or is designed to yield a general expression instead. It is advised to note the insufficiency of data if submitting the homework, while providing a simplified expression for the charge. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in problem statements for accurate calculations.
chmate
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Dielectric medium inside capacitor consists of two types (check the pic). Capacitor's plates are connected to a source of constant tension U. Distance between the plates is d and their area is S. Find the electric charge of capacitor's plates.

Data given: U=500 V, d=2cm, S=80cm^2, εr1=2.5, εr2=1.0.
(ε1=εr1*ε0 ^ ε2 = εr2*ε0)

The Attempt at a Solution



By applying Gauss's Law for a surface around the capacitor's plate, I manage to get the electric field intensity which is E=\frac{Q}{ε0εr1S1+ε0εr2S2}

U=\frac{Qd}{ε0εr1S1+ε0εr2S2}=500

which implies

Q=\frac{500(ε0εr1S1+ε0εr2S2)}{d}

I don't know how to continue after this because I don't know S1 and S2 separately.

Help me!
 

Attachments

  • det.jpg
    det.jpg
    3.8 KB · Views: 464
Physics news on Phys.org
If there's a variable left unspecified then your result will be an expression in that variable. Suppose you let r specify the division of the plate areas so that S1 = r*S and S2 = (1-r)*S.
 
Yes gneill, but still that doesn't solve the problem. Does this mean the book didn't give enough data?
 
chmate said:
Yes gneill, but still that doesn't solve the problem. Does this mean the book didn't give enough data?

It would seem that there are two possibilities:
1. The book mistakenly failed to provide enough data to solve the problem numerically.
2. The book intentionally did not provide enough data to solve the problem numerically and expects an expression for an answer.

A third but unlikely possibility is that the missing data doesn't matter if its variable somehow cancels out of the problem.

If this is a homework problem to be handed in, make note of the fact that there is not enough information for a complete numerical solution and provide a simplified expression for a result.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top