How to Find Density of States for Quantum Gas in D Dimensions?

Raz91
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the density of states g(ε) for an ideal quantum gas of spinless particles in dimension d with dispersion relation  ε= α|p|s , where ε is the energy and p is the momentum of a particle. The gas is confined to a large box of side L (so V = Ld) with periodic boundary conditions. The density of states is defined as the number of single particle energy states with energy between ε and ε + dε. You can use the volume of a d-dimensional sphere of radius R,
Ω0 = 2πd/2/dΓ(d/2)Rd.


The Attempt at a Solution



In 3D we solved this problem by solving the Schrodinger eq. where ε~p2
but what happen when the dispersion relation is ε= α|p|s?

My attempt was to define Γ(ε) as the number of states with energy ≤ ε
in d- dimentions Γ(ε) = the volume of a d-dimensional sphere of radius n(ε) (n ia the quantum num)
g(ε)=dΓ(ε)/dε

but how can i find the relation between n and ε?

is it ok to say : p=(h/2π)k and k=πn/L and then just put it in the dispertion relation?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Raz91 said:
but how can i find the relation between n and ε?

is it ok to say : p=(h/2π)k and k=πn/L and then just put it in the dispersion relation?

Yes, but k=πn/L is not the correct relation for periodic boundary conditions. (Darn factors of 2.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top