How to present the charges of quarks with the following Nc?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HerrBlatt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Quarks
HerrBlatt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Assume that quarks are presented in SU(Nc) with a unknown dimension of Nc, and define the rate Rμ of the scattering cross sections between e+e- -> hadrons(here, consider u, d, s, c, b quark) and e+e- -> μ+ μ-. Give out the result of Rμ with Nc. See detailed equations below.
Relevant Equations
Rμ = σ(e+e- -> hadrons)/ σ(e+e- -> μ+μ- )
I have already known the cross sections can be presented like this.
σ(e+e- -> hadrons)∝ Σ eq^2 & σ(e+e- -> μ+μ- ) ∝ e^2,
where eq is the charge of a certain quark(u, d, s, c or b)
But I don't know the relationship between Nc and eq.

(This is my first time to post a thread. I don't know how to insert a equation typed in LaTex or Word, so it may be a little tired to read...
I'm so sorry about that and thank you for help!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the sum run over for hadrons? It is not just the flavor. How is that related to the symmetry group?

You can use LaTeX with ##. #[/color]#a^2#[/color]# -> ##a^2##
 
You mean it also runs over colors? And we should multiply a Nc on it? In this way the sum will be 11/9 Nc?
 
HerrBlatt said:
You mean it also runs over colors?
Right. More colors -> more hadrons.
I'm not sure where the 11/9 came from.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top