How to Simplify and Find Power in a Circuit?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a circuit and finding the power dissipated in various resistors. The problem involves multiple resistors with different configurations, including series and parallel arrangements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods for simplifying the circuit, including combining resistors in series and parallel. There are attempts to calculate equivalent resistances and power dissipation, with some participants questioning the validity of certain simplifications.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the circuit's configuration and potential simplifications. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to find the equivalent resistance, with some noting the complexity of the circuit and suggesting alternative methods like Delta-Y transformations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with a circuit diagram that is not visible in the text, which may lead to assumptions about the configuration. There is also mention of specific resistor values and their arrangements, which may influence the discussion.

Paymemoney
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img802.imageshack.us/img802/9172/qns33.png

Simplifying the circuit?

Also find the power dissipated in the circuit?

Homework Equations


P=I^2R

V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution



I tired to simply the diagonal by making it parallel with (15+18ohms) and the (10+16ohms) and i get

R = (\frac{1}{33}+\frac{1}{48}+\frac{1}{16})^{-1} = 8.8ohms<br />
Power of 15ohms is: 1.3^2 * 15 = 25.35W

Now how would i find the power dissipated for the rest of the resistors?

P.S
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Paymemoney said:

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img802.imageshack.us/img802/9172/qns33.png
...

I tried to simply the diagonal by making it parallel with (15+18ohms) and the (10+16ohms) and i get

R = (\frac{1}{33}+\frac{1}{48}+\frac{1}{16})^{-1} = 8.8ohms<br />

The 48 Ω resistor is in parallel with the (10 Ω + 6 Ω ) combination.

\displaystyle R_{48,10,6}=\left({{1}\over{48}} + {{1}\over{16}} \right)^{-1}\Omega = 12\ \Omega

This combination, \displaystyle R_{48,10,6}\,, is in series with the 18 Ω resistor.

The 15 Ω resistor is in parallel with the combination of the other 4 resistors.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So it will end up being 10ohms when you have simplified everything.
 
Paymemoney said:
I tired to simply the diagonal by making it parallel with (15+18ohms) and the (10+16ohms) and i get

Whoa! The 15 and 18 ohm resistors have another branch coming off of their mutual junction; They won't simplify to being simply in parallel.

Now, you *could* get fancy (and complicated) and use something called a Delta-Y transformation on resistors 15, 18, and 48, but it is not necessary if you spot the fact that the 10 and 6 ohm resistors are already alone in series, so that their sum parallels the 48 ohm resistor directly.
 
Paymemoney said:
So it will end up being 10ohms when you have simplified everything.

Yes. The equivalent resistance for the circuit is 10 Ω.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K