How to tell which function has distance proportional to time?

AI Thread Summary
Distance is proportional to time when the relationship is linear, as seen in graphs A and B, where both show straight lines indicating a consistent increase in distance with time. Curve A is identified as having a direct proportionality, while Curve B fails to pass through the origin, disqualifying it from being proportional. Curve C is not linear, indicating that distance does not increase at a constant rate with time. The concept of proportionality implies a constant ratio, represented mathematically as y = kx, where k is a constant. The discussion clarifies that for a function to be proportional to time, it must adhere to a linear relationship, excluding other forms.
gurpalc
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://imgur.com/aYCc9

also in attachment

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to tell when distance is proportional to time. My guess is it would be graphs a and b because they're both straight lines and when time increases, distance increases a set amount as well.

Also can you explain why the curve function does not have distance proportionate to time?
 

Attachments

  • physics graph question.png
    physics graph question.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 651
Physics news on Phys.org
a) Curve A and B show distance as a linear function of time.

b) I believe only curve A shows distance proportional to time. Curve B does not pass through the origin. Curve C isn't straight.

Regarding Curve C. The expression "in proportion" hints at constant ratio. So for it to be directly proportional the equation must be of the form

y/x = k
or
y = kx

where k is a constant called the constant of proportionality. K can be -ve or +ve.
 
Last edited:
Also can you explain why the curve function does not have distance proportionate to time?

See above. In addition, for this particular example only, on the right hand side the distance appears to be increasing while time remains constant. Putting aside the practicalities of achieving infinite velocity it shows that in this region of the curve distance appears to be independant of time.
 
The expression "proportional to time" is normally taken to mean "proportional to time1 and excludes other powers such as timen, time1/n etc
 
Thanks everyone for the replies. I got it now.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top