How to tell which function has distance proportional to time?

AI Thread Summary
Distance is proportional to time when the relationship is linear, as seen in graphs A and B, where both show straight lines indicating a consistent increase in distance with time. Curve A is identified as having a direct proportionality, while Curve B fails to pass through the origin, disqualifying it from being proportional. Curve C is not linear, indicating that distance does not increase at a constant rate with time. The concept of proportionality implies a constant ratio, represented mathematically as y = kx, where k is a constant. The discussion clarifies that for a function to be proportional to time, it must adhere to a linear relationship, excluding other forms.
gurpalc
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://imgur.com/aYCc9

also in attachment

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to tell when distance is proportional to time. My guess is it would be graphs a and b because they're both straight lines and when time increases, distance increases a set amount as well.

Also can you explain why the curve function does not have distance proportionate to time?
 

Attachments

  • physics graph question.png
    physics graph question.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 650
Physics news on Phys.org
a) Curve A and B show distance as a linear function of time.

b) I believe only curve A shows distance proportional to time. Curve B does not pass through the origin. Curve C isn't straight.

Regarding Curve C. The expression "in proportion" hints at constant ratio. So for it to be directly proportional the equation must be of the form

y/x = k
or
y = kx

where k is a constant called the constant of proportionality. K can be -ve or +ve.
 
Last edited:
Also can you explain why the curve function does not have distance proportionate to time?

See above. In addition, for this particular example only, on the right hand side the distance appears to be increasing while time remains constant. Putting aside the practicalities of achieving infinite velocity it shows that in this region of the curve distance appears to be independant of time.
 
The expression "proportional to time" is normally taken to mean "proportional to time1 and excludes other powers such as timen, time1/n etc
 
Thanks everyone for the replies. I got it now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top