Hydrostatic force on a submerged object

ACE_99
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two large tanks are separated by a wall 20 cm thick, as shown in the figure below. One tank is filled with oil with ρoil = 876 kg/m3 and μoil = 0.45 Ns/m2. The other is filled with water with ρwater = 998 kg/m3 and μwater = 0.00100 Ns/m2. The depths of fluid in the two tanks are respectively 5 metres and 4 metres. A 90 cm diameter hole is drilled in the wall that separates the two tanks at a height of 3 metres above the bottom. An aluminum (ρaluminum = 2750 kg/m3) rod 90 cm in diameter and 80 cm long is placed in the hole, with equal amounts of the rod overhanging into the two tanks. There is no fluid between the aluminum rod and the wall (i.e. a perfect seal).

Find the force and moment (about the centre of the rod) that the wall exerts on the aluminum rod to ensure that the rod remains stationary

Homework Equations



F = PA = \rhoghA

The Attempt at a Solution



I started the problem by drawing a free body diagram of the pipe, I attached a picture.

F Roil and F Rwater are the resultant hydrostatic forces applied at the center of pressure by the liquid in the x direction. F Ry oil and F Rywater are the resultant hydrostatic forces applied at the center of pressure in the y direction. W is the weight of the rod in each liquid and Fb is the buoyant force.

After drawing a FBD I did a sum of forces about the x and y axis. Then I did a moment balance about point O, the red dot on the FBD picture. I haven't actually crunched out the numbers yet but based on my reasoning the wall wouldn't apply any force on the rod since it would be the forces and moments applied by the liquids on each side that would balance in order to keep the rod stationary. I have a feeling this isn't right though. Any help would be great.

http://i429.photobucket.com/albums/qq12/ACE_99_photo/FBD.jpg"

http://i429.photobucket.com/albums/qq12/ACE_99_photo/samplefinal.jpg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ACE_99 said:
I haven't actually crunched out the numbers yet but based on my reasoning the wall wouldn't apply any force on the rod since it would be the forces and moments applied by the liquids on each side that would balance in order to keep the rod stationary. I have a feeling this isn't right though.

Who said this?

And if you do have calculated the sum than you would have seen that the moments do not balance. The separating is not of zero width. Had it been zero, the moment due to the wall would have been zero.

PS You should post this in Introductary Phy
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top