Hyperfine Splitting In A Magnetic Field

jkrivda
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. Problem:
Consider Hydrogen in its ground state in a magnetic field of magnitude B.
Compute the effect of the magnetic field on the hyperfine structure of Hydrogen
(that is you should include the interaction of both the proton and electron magnetic
moments with the applied magnetic field). Give the values of the energy eigenvalues
for B = 1 gauss and for B = 104 gauss.

Homework Equations


the hamiltonian for a dipole moment is H=-μB
μp=gpeSp/2mp
μe=-eSe/me
F=J+I where F is the atom's total angular momentum

The Attempt at a Solution


well, i think that the Hamiltonian looks like:
H=μeBp+Bext(μe+μp)
so do we just act this H on the ground state wave function?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jkrivda said:
well, i think that the Hamiltonian looks like:
H=μeBp+Bext(μe+μp)
so do we just act this H on the ground state wave function?

Just a thought: From the wording of the problem, it seems to me that you want to find the effect of the external field on the hyperfine levels. So, I would think that you would assume the hyperfine levels are known and you just want to perturb those with the external field.

If so, wouldn't the perturbation part of the Hamiltonian just be due to the external field? Therefore you would have only the term Bext(μe+μp) as the perturbation? [EDIT: I think the term should have an overall negative sign.]

[EDIT 2: My comments might be invalid. You can only treat Bext(μe+μp) as a perturbation of the hyperfine levels if the perturbation is small compared to the hyperfine splitting. I think that might be true for an external field of 1 gauss, but not for 10,000 gauss. So, for 10,000 gauss I guess you have to treat both the hyperfine interaction and the external field interaction together as the perturbation of the unperturbed ground state level. Hope I'm not misleading you. Hopefully someone else will chime in.]
 
Last edited:
I think the name of topic is somewhat awkward.From what I understand,hyperfine splitting arises because of interaction of magnetic moment of proton with the spin of electron in hydrogen.By considering proton's magnetic moment arising from a localized current density one can write for the current associated with it as,
J=c(∇×M)
now this J gives rise to a potential,which can be calulatd from
A=k∫j(r')/|r-r'|(k is just some constant),now assuming a delta function source A gives
A=k'(∇×m)/r,{M=mδ(r')}
So B is given by B=∇×A,m is for proton which conventionally written as mp=(1/2)h-σpμp
now plugging it into m and evaluating B one writes for the interaction as
H'=-μe.B,(HERE μe is different from upper one)where B is just calculated
after it one uses some vector identity to get,
H'=-μeμp{(σ.σp)∇2-(σ.∇)(σp.∇)}(1/2r)(apart from some constant)
spherical averaging over s tate gives(because s state is spherically symmetric)
(σ.∇)(σp.∇)=1/3(σ.σp)∇2(be sure to verify it in spherical coordinates)
After which one gets,
H'=-μeμp(2/3)(σ.σp)∇2(1/2r)(apart from some constant)

this is evaluatd for ground state using the wavefunction of hydrogen(non-relativistic) to get
∫∇2(1/r)|ψ(r)|2 d3r=|ψ(0)|2(again some constant depending on unit chosen!)
After which (σ.σp)=-3 for singlet and 1 for triplet(easily seen by using S2=S12+S22+2S1.S2,IN TRIPLET S=1 and for singlet it is S=0)
the difference is taken for these two states for (σ.σp) will yield the required hyperfine splitting.
 
I just did not edit it,there are some mistakes.Like H' reads
H'=-μeσ.B,(I missed σ there):smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top